Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 07-05-2005, 09:27 PM
pokergripes pokergripes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default Re: Was Stu Ungar really a great poker player?

ok, good [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 07-05-2005, 09:39 PM
pokergripes pokergripes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default Re: Was Stu Ungar really a great poker player?

Sorry, you're right...that was mean of me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:48 AM
Smoothcall Smoothcall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7
Default Re: Was Stu Ungar really a great poker player?

That's better. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 07-06-2005, 07:50 AM
Angelic_Ace Angelic_Ace is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: His WSOP feats - not that great he beat 73 and 75 players in 80,81

You may discount the skill in poker, and generally it is exaggerated. Can it be denied though that Ungar was an extraordinary talent, and that the awe and celebrity with which he is showered is reasonable? He was peerless in gin, won the WSOP 3 times, and could card-count six shoes. Why do you choose to discredit him and sneer at his perception among poker enthusiasts?
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 07-06-2005, 01:48 PM
pokergripes pokergripes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default Re: His WSOP feats - not that great he beat 73 and 75 players in 80,81

[ QUOTE ]
You may discount the skill in poker, and generally it is exaggerated. Can it be denied though that Ungar was an extraordinary talent, and that the awe and celebrity with which he is showered is reasonable? He was peerless in gin, won the WSOP 3 times, and could card-count six shoes. Why do you choose to discredit him and sneer at his perception among poker enthusiasts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where, exactly, do you see anybody "discrediting" him or "sneering" about anything? People in this thread are talking about whether he was, or was not, "The World's Best Poker Player" (like it says on the cover of the book), or one of the (few) best ever, or possibly more of a tourney star but not as good in cash games.

Those are all (somewhat) interesting questions, and the topic easily meets the standard (such as it is) for being interesting enough for this forum...how is talking about those questions sneering or discrediting anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:21 PM
stabn stabn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 2,051
Default Re: Thread Recap for latecomers

Pot..kettle...I think you know where this is going vince.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:46 PM
Smoothcall Smoothcall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7
Default Re: Thread Recap for latecomers

No, i have no clue what your talking about. But have a good idea you don't either.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 07-06-2005, 07:06 PM
Angelic_Ace Angelic_Ace is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: His WSOP feats - not that great he beat 73 and 75 players in 80,81

I am responding to Mr. Phillips' posts where it seems to me he was doing both aforementioned actions.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 07-06-2005, 09:24 PM
virus five virus five is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
Default Re: Was Stu Ungar really a great poker player?

[ QUOTE ]
It's interesting to note that in The Biggest Game in Town, Stu Ungar makes a dreadful call with KK when Perry Green bets twice the pot with an ace on board, and spikes a third king on the turn. There's no doubting that Ungar was a great player, but I think the myths about him are perpetuated by people who believe that 'Rounders' style hand reading is possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

That account of the action is wrong. HERE is a link that explains play as it went down.

There are also several accounts of Ungar being able to read gin hands perfectly, and this being true, I have little doubts of his abilities at hold'em.

An excellent display of his playing can be seen in the video footage of the 1997 WSOP final table.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.