|
|
#1
01-26-2005, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Nate
Okay, I'm going to do some overt knobslobbing here.
This forum is like 100 times better when Nate is here. It's almost worth collectively paying whatever he makes writing about such useless things as baseball to post here all the time. That is all. -Michael 
|
|
#2
01-26-2005, 01:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
nate is better served spending his time cheering on the useless cubs. that is all.
|
|
#3
01-26-2005, 01:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
if you think his poker writing is good, subscribe to Prospectus and/or by their book. IMO his baseball writing is even better than his poker writing. he definitely has dominated this place since he came back though.
|
|
#4
01-26-2005, 01:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
slurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp ;P
agreed.
|
|
#5
01-26-2005, 01:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
damn you guys are quick monkeys.
|
|
#6
01-26-2005, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
[ QUOTE ]
damn you guys are quick monkeys. [/ QUOTE ] 3-minute response time is too slow, fish
|
|
#7
01-26-2005, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
He needs a forum Playerview.
-Michael
|
|
#8
01-26-2005, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
if you think his poker writing is good, subscribe to Prospectus and/or by their book. IMO his baseball writing is even better than his poker writing.
Yes. BP reader since way before poker. I wish I knew enough about that game to write about it.
|
|
#10
01-26-2005, 01:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nate
It was a 2 minute response by me. The second post was a minute later.
LOL yes I need a 2+2 playerview hahaha. good one [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
