|
View Poll Results: Is keeping them worse than illegally DL music? | |||
Yes | 18 | 32.73% | |
no | 37 | 67.27% | |
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
which has weaker players at NL50?
in full ring.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
I would say full tilt. But there are a lot of annoying short-stacks, even up to the 200 level.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
It depends on what you mean by "weaker." I think that UB's players are more weak/tight, FT's are more LAG.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
Dunno, FT players are tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight in my experience, too many bonus whores, but I havent played there in about 6 months.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
People are literally giving their money away at FullTilt, commiting their whole stack with top pair etc.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
i think ub is easier
|
|
|