Results - 200 Party 10+1 SNGs

[dmmikkel]

I'm crushing 10+1 and I had -ROI for 250 SNGs (with 35% ITM). I don't see how you can evaluate someones game after only 200.

[Hood]

[ QUOTE ]
but you can do better than 36% ITM.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you are too focused on ITM.

I don't see how you could have a negative ROI for 250 games if you are "crushing" the $10+ 1's. Maybe you weren't crushing them then?

[45suited]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how you could have a negative ROI for 250 games if you are "crushing" the $10+ 1's. Maybe you weren't crushing them then?

[/ QUOTE ]

I had a stretch of 200 games at the 11s where I had a negative ROI (-7%). This was immediately followed by a stretch of 200 games where I was up 110 buy-ins (55% ROI). Variance happens.

[protoverus]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm crushing 10+1 and I had -ROI for 250 SNGs (with 35% ITM). I don't see how you can evaluate someones game after only 200.

[/ QUOTE ]


Bingo! Same experience...Beating game handily over long run, but have had a couple 200+ runs of almost those exact finsh and ROI #'s...and some worse with -ROI.

Sometimes those are great stats...you had sucky cards, you couldn't steal cause everyone raised in front of you all game, and YET you slipped into the money through perseverence and ekeing out what was there!! Othertimes, those stats suck when you played timidly with your big stack on the bubble.

Which is it? Only you can tell.

Be well.

[protoverus]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how you could have a negative ROI for 250 games if you are "crushing" the $10+ 1's. Maybe you weren't crushing them then?

[/ QUOTE ]

Then I'd venture to say you don't have enough experience playing SNG's yet.

If you define crushing as 20% ROI you'll still get runs like that.

be well

[GtrHtr]

[ QUOTE ]
4-Tabling
Entry Fees: 2200
Profit: 80
ITM: 36%
ROI: 3.6%
Rakeback: 50

Finish Distribution:
1 - 11% - 22
2 - 9% - 18
3 - 16% - 32
4 - 10.5% - 21
5 - 15% - 30
6 - 17% - 34
7 - 9% - 18
8 - 8% - 16
9 - 3.5% - 7
10 - 1% - 2

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't worry about your ROI or ITM over 200 played as much as I'd worry about your top 4 finishes %. My guess is that you are playing too many hands early as your 5-8 place finish disto is higher than it should be.

[GtrHtr]

oh and are you 4 tabling sets or staggered or continuous?

[wulfheir]

i start 4 tables, wait until they are all done, then start 4 more. on the odd occasion my AA gets busted in 9th or 10th, i'll start a new one to replace it.

i'm not concerned with extracting any data from my 200, i just posted it in case other noobs like myself are interested to see how their peers are doing.

[Vasquez]

Wulfheir i have the same numbers as you . I have alot of 5th/6th place finishes. I know sample size is small but i wonder if we are doing something wrong.

-Vas