#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb question, will this affect the \"really high limit\' players at all
I mean, RB isn't a huge deal to them, and they're basically just mobile to whereever the fish are, regardless of RB as a result.
Therefore it doesn't look to me like they'll be hurt by party taking over the network. --Dave. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dumb question, will this affect the \"really high limit\' players at all
id imagine RB is more of a deal to them than others......prob bout $40/$50 per hour they could earn on top of poker wins
an extra $2/3k a week is a big deal no matter what limit ur playing |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dumb question, will this affect the \"really high limit\' players at
[ QUOTE ]
I mean, RB isn't a huge deal to them, and they're basically just mobile to whereever the fish are, regardless of RB as a result. Therefore it doesn't look to me like they'll be hurt by party taking over the network. --Dave. [/ QUOTE ] I think you're right. I also think that high-limit tables at party last night must have been particularly juicy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dumb question, will this affect the \"really high limit\' players at all
An averagely good player can get a 6% roi at the $215's, rakeback accounts for about 2%, so they pretty much got a 33% paycut. On top of that they have to play under there sole Party username, instead of being able to use 3 or 4 to add deception. This will cause opponents to get a read on you much quicker cuz they see you more often. Which also cuts in on your roi. If anything, it hurts the big players more.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dumb question, will this affect the \"really high limit\' players at all
it is a pretty big deal to us if we can't get RB. but most can still. would be a major loss if I didn't.
|
|
|