Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:09 AM
Randy_Refeld Randy_Refeld is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Casino - Tunica
Posts: 53
Default Re: Interesting ruling..

[ QUOTE ]
This dealer was just plain lazy whether the stacks were 20, 25 or 19 chips and misrepresnting the stack by 1 chip is no more excuseable then misrepresenting it by 5.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is where poker is diffrent. Unless asked to count (like this case) the dealer should not touch the bets unless bringing them into the center.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:23 AM
Rick Nebiolo Rick Nebiolo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,179
Default Re: Interesting ruling..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A dealer could be forgiven for stating that five 19 chip stacks is $500

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the only part I disagree with.
The fact that any stack COULD be 19 or 21 chips is the reason the dealer HAS to break it down and not just 'eyeball' it.
Failing to double-check it is inexcuseable......

......This dealer was just plain lazy whether the stacks were 20, 25 or 19 chips and misrepresnting the stack by 1 chip is no more excuseable then misrepresenting it by 5.

[/ QUOTE ]

Now that I think about it you're right. Of course as mentioned below he only counts if asked.

~ Rick
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:26 AM
Rick Nebiolo Rick Nebiolo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,179
Default Re: Interesting ruling..

[ QUOTE ]
I see more and more NL problems being posted because there are very few people playing that are familiar with NL procedures. In the past there were only a handful of NL games and the players all knew the rules and places that spread them woudl have floormen that knew the rules so it worked out well. Now NL is being played by inexperienced players with inexperienced staff.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bingo!

~ Rick
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:21 PM
Al_Capone_Junior Al_Capone_Junior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,026
Default Re: Interesting ruling..

I agree dealers should not touch the stacks until asked. but at that point, if the dealer is going to announce $500, then he needs to count it and make sure that's how much it really is.

al
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:40 PM
Rick Nebiolo Rick Nebiolo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,179
Default Re: Interesting ruling..

[ QUOTE ]
I agree dealers should not touch the stacks until asked. but at that point, if the dealer is going to announce $500, then he needs to count it and make sure that's how much it really is. - al

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree. In my above post I meant if asked "how big the bet".

My understanding is the dealer *should* never announce or count the size of the bet unless asked by a potential caller/raiser. This is so he doesn't induce or reduce action. Of course if he is asked, he needs to count any stack of "non-eyeball" size (let's say more than five chips) so he doesn't make an error.

Regarding *should*, I'm not sure this is standard most places and it certainly isn't consistently done even where it is policy.

~ Rick
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Interesting ruling..

[ QUOTE ]
My understanding is the dealer *should* never announce or count the size of the bet unless asked by a potential caller/raiser.

[/ QUOTE ]

Though I have heard this (it has never been an instruction from my floor) I disagree with it in principal. I firmly believe that in running the game efficiently the dealer should announce the action accurately as it occurs so that all players know what the action is. However for the sake of speeding the game I do not think the dealer should breakdown and count large bets (especially all in bets which are are not likely to be called by multiple players).

Especially when dealing with smaller bets the rule that you can't announce a bet size could easily bring the game to a crawl.

blinds 2/5 UTG raises to $25. If I don't announce the raise to $25 and just announce a raise the follwing will happen.

Player throws in a single red chip
Dealer: Sir, there has been a raise.
Player stares at Dealer blankly
Dealer: Sir, its more to call there has been a raise.
Player: stares blankly
Dealer: Sir what would you like to do here sir?
Player: There was a Raise?
Dealer: Yes
Player: Who raised?
Dealer the gentleman to your right with multiple chips in front of him?
Player: I call
Dealer: Ok then.
Player: how much is it?

If I can announce the bet size I can skip right to

Dealer: Its $20 more to call.
Player: who raised.
Dealer: The player next you with $25 in front of him.


Also when players use $1 chips breaking it down and counting it may be relevant to the calculating the rake.

Another issue is in determining whether a raise was legal or not. Player A shoves out an odd sized stack of chips and Player B announces raise to $200. If I have not counted Player A's stack I can not know whether a raise to $200 is legal or not.

I am a firm believer that if counting the bet will speed up the game and make it run more efficiently then a dealer should count the bet. This is a often a judgment call
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.