Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-05-2005, 05:05 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw CALLING OUT THE PRE-FLOP FOLDERS

OK. All of you guys that want to fold this pre-flop step up and post your BB/Hand for the SB and BB. Let's see where we all stand.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-05-2005, 05:13 PM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw CALLING OUT THE PRE-FLOP FOLDERS

[ QUOTE ]
OK. All of you guys that want to fold this pre-flop step up and post your BB/Hand for the SB and BB. Let's see where we all stand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've seen your PT numbers out of the blinds, and I will just be honest and say that I don't believe them. I'm not saying you're just making them up; I'm saying that you're going to get well-acquainted with a concept called "reversion to the mean" sometime in the future. They're far out of whack with any other set of stats I've ever seen posted, and the fact that you semi-coldcall all day long with suited junk out of the SB makes me even more convinced that you're just running well from those positions.

In answer to your question, though, I'm at (.13) in the BB and (.12) in the SB. I think my PT BB winrate is overstated.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-05-2005, 05:29 PM
Redd Redd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw CALLING OUT THE PRE-FLOP FOLDERS

[ QUOTE ]
OK. All of you guys that want to fold this pre-flop step up and post your BB/Hand for the SB and BB. Let's see where we all stand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Grjr, the fact that you feel one's winrate from a single position has any bearing over the number of hands anyone here has played shows that you're misunderstanding at least one concept.

You said you're not playing for high card value at all here; then would you also complete 52s into an UTG raise?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-05-2005, 06:05 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw CALLING OUT THE PRE-FLOP FOLDERS

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
OK. All of you guys that want to fold this pre-flop step up and post your BB/Hand for the SB and BB. Let's see where we all stand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Grjr, the fact that you feel one's winrate from a single position has any bearing over the number of hands anyone here has played shows that you're misunderstanding at least one concept.

You said you're not playing for high card value at all here; then would you also complete 52s into an UTG raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Now don't go and misquote me. I said "I'm not that concerned with high card strength". T7s is a better hand than 52s because a pair of tens (or sevens) will win a lot more than a pair of fives. With more callers though I would probably call with 52s but not here.

The point about the winrate from the blinds is that the people who think I'm nuts for calling all these raises from the blinds with suited "crap" might ought to consider that perhaps I'm doing something right. Maybe I've been lucky, I don't know, but I've been lucky for 40,000 hands so far.

Remember, every time you fold a blind you've lost money.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-05-2005, 06:21 PM
Redd Redd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw CALLING OUT THE PRE-FLOP FOLDERS

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I've been lucky, I don't know, but I've been lucky for 40,000 hands so far.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then you've played about 4000 small blinds. Lets assume a generous global 10% average PFR, giving you a chance to make 400 cool-completes (Note that this is also ignoring blind-steal situations). Assuming you call half of them, that's a sample size of 200 hands that you're using to determine whether or not it's profitable to CC from the SB. Do you think this is statistically significant?

If you want to examine the situation where you're coldcalling an UTG raise (which I think is important here), it becomes more like 15 hands.

[ QUOTE ]
Remember, every time you fold a blind you've lost money.

[/ QUOTE ]

Every time you post a blind, you've lost money. Every time you fold, the expectation is 0 EV. Every time you call a hand that you shouldn't, the expecation is -EV.

I think I'm done with this thread. I've made my case, and there's not much else I can add to the subject. You're welcome to take or leave everyone's opinions here.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-05-2005, 06:39 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw turns sour

How often will you hit a home run flop here?

Trips+: 1.45%
2-pair: 2.02%
Flush Draw or Flush: 11.78%
Straight or OESD: 3.9%

Total: 5.4:1 against

You are getting 5.7:1 here (at best). With the rake, I think that this is a fold. It is very close though.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-05-2005, 06:41 PM
aron aron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 233
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw turns sour

Hi Brad!

Seen you posting stats like this before, where do you get them from?

-aron
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-05-2005, 06:43 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw turns sour

[ QUOTE ]
Hi Brad!

Seen you posting stats like this before, where do you get them from?

-aron

[/ QUOTE ]

Brain power. The straight and straight draw ones are kinda tricky to figure out. Each way that you can flop a straight or straight draw that only uses one hole card is .33% and each straight draw that uses both hole cards (so in this hand a 98x flop) is 3.3%. You also have to consider that monotone flops are bad (so I don't factor those in) and that they overlap with flush draws from time to time. So in reality, you will flop each straight draw combo 2.6% of the time and each straight combo .26% of the time.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-05-2005, 07:21 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw turns sour

[ QUOTE ]
How often will you hit a home run flop here?

Trips+: 1.45%
2-pair: 2.02%
Flush Draw or Flush: 11.78%
Straight or OESD: 3.9%

Total: 5.4:1 against

You are getting 5.7:1 here (at best). With the rake, I think that this is a fold. It is very close though.

Brad

[/ QUOTE ]

But you're leaving out the times you win with a pair of tens. I just now had the hand that follows. (Note: I don't usually call with this but I was in the middle of reading comments about my loose ways and was a little aggravated [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img])

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls.

Flop: (8.50 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Hero calls, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: (7.75 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls.

River: (10.75 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, CO checks.

Final Pot: 10.75 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has 9c Th (two pair, tens and eights).
UTG+1 has Ac Ks (one pair, eights).
CO has Ah Kh (one pair, eights).
Outcome: Hero wins 10.75 BB. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-05-2005, 07:31 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Marginal hand #5 Flush draw CALLING OUT THE PRE-FLOP FOLDERS

[ QUOTE ]

I think I'm done with this thread. I've made my case, and there's not much else I can add to the subject. You're welcome to take or leave everyone's opinions here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I appreciate you taking time to respond to this. I assume you realize you won't change my mind though. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

I just want to say one thing about EV calculations. It's my opinion that most people who do them don't account enough for implied odds; especially in multiway raised pots. I may be wrong but that's the way I look at it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.