hu 5/10 river decisions vs fsuplayer - deepish

[lapoker17]

this is factually accurate, but i don't think i would ever spell lambasted like that. although i sort of like "lamb basted" and might start using it now.

[flawless_victory]

[ QUOTE ]
this is factually accurate, but i don't think i would ever spell lambasted like that. although i sort of like "lamb basted" and might start using it now.

[/ QUOTE ]
funny cause as i read that i was thinkng, WTF?
doesnt seem like him to misspell.

[soah]

I stopped reading that posted at "lamb basted" and then when I finished reading, I went back and stared at it some more.

[fsuplayer]

[ QUOTE ]
this is factually accurate, but i don't think i would ever spell lambasted like that. although i sort of like "lamb basted" and might start using it now.

[/ QUOTE ]

you had it as "amb basted" i believe. i took the (incorrect) liberty of adding an 'L'.

you know u cant use those fancy words with me.
i thought maybe it was a saying id never heard of.

[Jason Strasser]

haha

good post.

Anyway, I think the point I'm trying to make here is that betting to induce a bluff then calling is probably a poor idea, unless you think you can make very good decisions when faced with a river CR.

You must have bet the river to induce a bluff so you should now call. IF that's not the case, then I think it's a bad bet on the river. Check behind.