Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-23-2005, 03:31 PM
Phill S Phill S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nr Manchester, England
Posts: 255
Default Re: Bubble survival

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
- Don't play the 6s, the rake is the same at the 11s.

- This is read dependant. You should take into account your being the 3d stack and the number of BB's remaining in your stack and when the blinds go up again.

- Pushing this is +EV. How +EV it is depends on the calling standards you've been able to ID through your reads. If they are loose callers, the +EV edge is huge.

- Standard push.

[/ QUOTE ]

What?!? If they are loose callers, a push is way -EV. With a marginal hand (and often even with a premium hand), the last thing you want is a call on the bubble.

At the low level SNGs, I usually just fold this, because they call way too often (which I don't want) and don't push enough (so I have time to wait).

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, this makes no sense when compared to that other thread where you say reads are pointless below the 215 games.

This is a really easy push btw.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-23-2005, 04:37 PM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 65
Default Re: Bubble survival

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
- Don't play the 6s, the rake is the same at the 11s.

- This is read dependant. You should take into account your being the 3d stack and the number of BB's remaining in your stack and when the blinds go up again.

- Pushing this is +EV. How +EV it is depends on the calling standards you've been able to ID through your reads. If they are loose callers, the +EV edge is huge.

- Standard push.

[/ QUOTE ]

What?!? If they are loose callers, a push is way -EV. With a marginal hand (and often even with a premium hand), the last thing you want is a call on the bubble.

At the low level SNGs, I usually just fold this, because they call way too often (which I don't want) and don't push enough (so I have time to wait).

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, this makes no sense when compared to that other thread where you say reads are pointless below the 215 games.



[/ QUOTE ]

That's not what I said. Jeez.

What I said was "Most decisions are not opponent-specific read-based". This statement is simply and obviously true.

The above post happens to be one that I think is read-based. As are many of the posts to this forum, because the easy decisions don't generally get posted.

Just to make it clear, I get as many reads as I can 8-tabling. Sometimes those reads are useful. Often they are not, and I go an entire SnG playing my standard strategy *for that buyin.* (Note that a buyin-specific strategy is not the same as an opponent-specific read.)

Now everybody leave me alone, it's almost Thanksgiving. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.