Committing with AQ vs shortstack limper

[Big_Jim]

He means PF.

Limpers can't bluff.

oh...ok.

[SpaceAce]

[ QUOTE ]
And do you think he limps and calls $100 with absolutely nothing? Rarely. Without a read, you have to give him credit for a pair, at least.

You're behind, the pot isn't big enough, .....muck AQ.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to take the bold step of standing with TxRedMan on this one. You're only getting a little worse than the proper odds if he has a smallish pair. Your opponent only needs to be bluffing every once in a while if he has nothing but a smallish pair on those occasions when he is not bluffing. The times he has AK, 33, 44 or a big pair really make a call here unprofitable, I think. Basically, you're getting slightly the worst of it even if all the stars are aligned. I mean, really: how often is this guy bluffing all-in after limping under the gun and calling when you raise out of the blinds?

SpaceAce

Wow. That's a first.

Is the OP going to post the results???

[creedofhubris]

He's not that short. Easy fold.

If all he had was $250 more, easy call.