Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-07-2005, 08:16 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Full HH of bubble from a $109 (longish) - several interesting hand


I think folding that KJo is basically fine.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-08-2005, 06:58 AM
codewarrior codewarrior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mentor, OH, USA
Posts: 79
Default Re: Full HH of bubble from a $109 (longish) - several interesting hand

Yes, you are correct in your read. I tried something different, probably not wise in this case, though.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-08-2005, 07:11 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: Full HH of bubble from a $109 (longish) - several interesting hand

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like folding KJ UTG in #12. Would you like to explain why you folded here? I assume that this is because of short SB and monster BB? By raising to 3xBB you allow the monster stack to bully you by reraising, but without reads can you really assume that he's cabable of such a move? At least in a 50+5 the average opponent has no idea about how to exploit their big stack on the bubble, and I would raise here every time with such a strong hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Villain is a 2+2er. (codewarrior) He posted in this thread. I think it's a good idea to stay away from a 2+2ing BS here, especially since you're UTG.

Is 3 a push? I'm too tight there, so I don't know. But I guess it's a fold.

I also like raising up with KJ in the BB and a Villain complete.

Gotta complete or push 66 there or something.

Other than that, it looks fine.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-08-2005, 07:36 PM
ChuckNorris ChuckNorris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 54
Default Re: Full HH of bubble from a $109 (longish) - several interesting hand

Yeah, the KJ in #12 was fine. I can't really understand now why I took it up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.