|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you do? | |||
| Check |
   
|
7 | 30.43% |
| Bet $10 (about half the pot) |
  
|
3 | 13.04% |
| Bet $18 (the pot) |
  
|
1 | 4.35% |
| Just go all-in ($24) |
  
|
11 | 47.83% |
| Other (please specify) |
  
|
1 | 4.35% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
04-18-2005, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
Kant's position on free will, the nomenal vs phenomenal duality, with real choice only appearing in the unobservable nomunal 'real' world was little more than a clever peice of wordplay used to evade the logical conclusions that follow from his work on the limits of reason.
|
|
#12
04-18-2005, 10:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Choice?
Why you chose free will:
1. You are convinced that you have it. 2. You were posed a question in an internet forum. Why you're convinced that you have it: After considering both possibilities, this seems to be the logical answer. Why this seems to be the logical answer: This is what you have come to believe through experience. Why you were posed a question in an internet forum: Bescause SpearsBritney has nothing better to do with his time than post over-debated philisophical questions. Why SpearsBritney has nothing better to do with his time than post over-debated philisophical questions: Because...you fill in the blank [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
04-18-2005, 10:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Choice?
[ QUOTE ]
Kant's position on free will, the nomenal vs phenomenal duality, with real choice only appearing in the unobservable nomunal 'real' world was little more than a clever peice of wordplay used to evade the logical conclusions that follow from his work on the limits of reason. [/ QUOTE ] English only please (and stop googling your quotes) [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
04-18-2005, 10:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Choice?
[ QUOTE ]
Can this even be proven to any degree? SGS [/ QUOTE ] Seeing how everything can be argued back and forth indefinatley (including many 'scientific facts' that seem to be disproved every 50 years or so), I would say that there is technically no real way to 'prove' anything. Unless you consider 'proving' to be the convincing of atleast 51% of the population.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
