Poker Stars $5/10 winrate

loose passive · #1 11-11-2005, 07:49 PM

I just compiled my first 1k hands into PokerTracker and I am showing a winrate of +17BB per 100 hands. I do not believe this is sustainable. What might be a realistic winrate be?

Being new at using PokerTracker I am trying to figure out what is the relevant information. I went to auto rate players and it labeled me as Semi Loose Aggressive Aggressive. Is this a good label to have? Is this relevant?

The other stats I have are vpip of about 20% and pfr about 11% and showdown winrate of 58%.

What other stats should I be looking at?

How many hands do I need before I can truly know where I stand?

SteveGriff · #2 11-11-2005, 07:52 PM

Ask that question again when you reach 10,000 hands or so. You should get a better understanding of your game and how well you actually play then.

Plus, you should post along with your BB/100 stat all your other stats including VPIP, W$SD etc.

Steve Griff

BurnsvilleCardClub · #3 11-11-2005, 08:37 PM

17BB/100 Hand .... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] For an accurate account of what your real winrate is going to be, get up as many hands as possible and I mean as many. I would shoot for 100K or more...as a ballpark

mowz · #4 11-11-2005, 08:46 PM

There was a post a few weeks ago where someone showed their 2/4 wintrate over hands 1-100k, 100k-200k, and 200k-300k. They were like 1.4, 1.7, 2.2 or something. basically even over a large sample size your winrate varies. 20k of positive hand and *probably* you are a winner, but I (and others here) have had 10k+ runs in the red and still come out to be winning players. The same can happen in the opposite directions.

Alex/Mugaaz · #5 11-11-2005, 09:57 PM

Hayguyz, I just pl@yed some HU 1/2. According to PT my WR is 98bb/100, this this sustainable!?!?!?!?

loose passive · #6 11-11-2005, 10:36 PM

Thank you for your kind input and constructive advice.

Alex/Mugaaz · #7 11-11-2005, 10:51 PM

Sorry I was a joke, it's just there are so many of these posts and they serve no purpose at all. THere is a search function, it's not that hard to select small stakes forum, 2 year depth, and search for winrate. Really, it isn't.

imported_anacardo · #8 11-11-2005, 11:00 PM

[ QUOTE ]
There was a post a few weeks ago where someone showed their 2/4 wintrate over hands 1-100k, 100k-200k, and 200k-300k. They were like 1.4, 1.7, 2.2 or something. basically even over a large sample size your winrate varies. 20k of positive hand and *probably* you are a winner, but I (and others here) have had 10k+ runs in the red and still come out to be winning players. The same can happen in the opposite directions.

[/ QUOTE ]

The trend of that winrate suggests to me that somebody's learning to play better poker as time goes by. That happens too.

waffle · #9 11-11-2005, 11:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Ask that question again when you reach 50,000 hands or so.

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp.

Alex/Mugaaz · #10 11-11-2005, 11:07 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There was a post a few weeks ago where someone showed their 2/4 wintrate over hands 1-100k, 100k-200k, and 200k-300k. They were like 1.4, 1.7, 2.2 or something. basically even over a large sample size your winrate varies. 20k of positive hand and *probably* you are a winner, but I (and others here) have had 10k+ runs in the red and still come out to be winning players. The same can happen in the opposite directions.

[/ QUOTE ]

The trend of that winrate suggests to me that somebody's learning to play better poker as time goes by. That happens too.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I saw that, but mostly what I saw was a complete nit who doesn't want to move up even though his bankroll should be huge. =p