#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Makes sense to NOT move up?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I've only played a handful of six-handed SNGs, but I sent off a note to PS asking about the higher buy-in games. Just adding another voice to your quest. [/ QUOTE ] thanks, man, I really appreciate it! [/ QUOTE ]A response withing an hour (or so): "So far as limited play at bigger stakes... yes, I know what you mean, and you hit the nail on the head. The games we spread are in direct response to the demand. If and when more people begin asking for higher stakes, then we will begin spreading more games at those levels." Sounds like you just need to get more of your fellow 6-handed players to ask. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Makes sense to NOT move up?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I've only played a handful of six-handed SNGs, but I sent off a note to PS asking about the higher buy-in games. Just adding another voice to your quest. [/ QUOTE ] thanks, man, I really appreciate it! [/ QUOTE ]A response withing an hour (or so): "So far as limited play at bigger stakes... yes, I know what you mean, and you hit the nail on the head. The games we spread are in direct response to the demand. If and when more people begin asking for higher stakes, then we will begin spreading more games at those levels." Sounds like you just need to get more of your fellow 6-handed players to ask. [/ QUOTE ] I will definitely do that, but I don't understand this response. What the hell is keeping them from just opening up a new series of tables? The bandwidth doesn't cost anything and the code can just be copied and pasted...it's not like people wouldn't play it. Nonetheless I'll get the regulars I know on it. Thanks again! |
|
|