Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-13-2005, 07:24 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Interesting Poker Stars Observation

Just started playing PokerStars and I have noticed something at the low limits --

Not only are the bad players just as fishy as Party, but many of them multi-table. So, you have multiple chances to take their money.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2005, 07:29 PM
1p0kerb0y 1p0kerb0y is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: DeLand, Florida
Posts: 49
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

How low are you talking about here?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2005, 07:41 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

I had players at $1-$2 flagged as fish, and saw a lot of bad play. Then noticed those same players at 3 and 4 tables.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2005, 12:01 PM
BlackRain BlackRain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 241
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

limit holdem you mean? i frequent 1/2 NL and i know several 2+2'ers who do as well. ya the fish are plenty but most dont multitable.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:24 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

Yes, limit games. I just thought it was interesting that on Party the fish pretty much are at 1 table (lately a 6-max one), while at Stars there is a greater tendency for them to multi-table.

And I had a guy start berating a player when he got his KK cracked after limping in with it on the button. Beat by the SB who had 99, flopped a set, and raised and re-raised it all the way. In the ensuring conversation between the two (after the player had made statements like he never raises AA because he always gets beat), he admited to also playing at two NL tables at the same time.

So this chump was not only multi-tabling, he was mixing NL with Limit games at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:52 PM
68Mustang 68Mustang is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

PS is definately a gold mine. Even with .10 and .20 limit , max multitabling with no thinking robotic SSH play makes a huge profit and the no-rake taken is a nice bonus.Can't wait for my BR to reach the .25/.50 tables.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:01 PM
BigBiceps BigBiceps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 78
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

I don't understand your example.

Are you saying not to call in the SB with 99 to a late position raise?

Or that he was bad for multiple raises later with a disguised hand?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:16 PM
miajag81 miajag81 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 9
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

Party's fishiness as compared to Stars has always been overblown IMO. Don't get me wrong, Party is probably the fishiest, but not much more so than Stars. There's plenty of money to be made in those games (up to and including $200NL at least).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2005, 02:09 PM
68Mustang 68Mustang is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

I'am about 25k hands into limit.05/.10 on PS. (BB/100 4.5) My observation is.. anyone with a child or self portrait as their avatar is an ATM. It's a vague assumption but steadily being proven.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2005, 02:48 PM
Predator314 Predator314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton, WV
Posts: 139
Default Re: Interesting Poker Stars Observation

[ QUOTE ]
I'am about 25k hands into limit.05/.10 on PS. (BB/100 4.5) My observation is.. anyone with a child or self portrait as their avatar is an ATM. It's a vague assumption but steadily being proven.

[/ QUOTE ]

99.99% of the .05/.10 population are donks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.