|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
I donīt think he pushes 2 pair on the turn and will never fold it to a push, that is why I moved in
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
[ QUOTE ]
I donīt think he pushes 2 pair on the turn and will never fold it to a push, that is why I moved in [/ QUOTE ] Sorry tony, I misread the hand ( i am going to delete my post now, although what i said is still true IMO. Like dustbuster said, just value bet that fishy. Oh yeah, use a converter please. Nope read it again, I read it right the first time. OOPS, tired. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
You are both saying fishes dont fold and this one called my turn raise when the A came. I think you are missing alot of value if you dont overbet in spots like this
What is a converter? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
[ QUOTE ]
You are both saying fishes dont fold and this one called my turn raise when the A came. I think you are missing alot of value if you dont overbet in spots like this What is a converter? [/ QUOTE ] Okay they don't fold, but most of them can fold marginal hands to huge overbets on the river. I am sure with an infinitesimal amount of effort you can figure out what a coverter is, you do have 200 posts. BTW, the turn is my concern, not the river. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
Im not really english speaking and whats with the attitude?
"Then dont fold" Why would I do that, I got the nuts? I also think they can fold a marginal hand, but a strong A or two pair is not marginal to a fish IMO |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
"then don't fold" I am not sure what you are quoting here. i said, " they don't fold, but can fold marginal hands to huge bets on the river."
I apologize if there is a language barrier here, but that is as simple as I can say that. I didn't mean to give you any attitude, sorry if it seemed that way. However, if you are so sure he has a two pair or a strong A and think he will call an overbet on the river, fine. in that case, you are going with a read on your opponent, which most of us do every day. However, when you post a hand asking for advice, we are assuming you are unsure as to what the best play is. Our responses are going to be standard and generic in most cases because that is how you play against the fish--play poker against those that know what they are doing (or just avoid them if you can). If you feel that you are right and "we are missing a lot of value" by not pushing the river, then why did you post the hand? (not trying to be a dick). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
"apologize if there is a language barrier here, but that is as simple as I can say that.
I didn't mean to give you any attitude, sorry if it seemed that way." "If you feel that you are right and "we are missing a lot of value" by not pushing the river, then why did you post the hand? (not trying to be a dick)" Ness, its no problem. I dont think anything bad about U. If you read my headline my consideration was about my turn raise and concerning my all in on the end I think that whats differs from small stakes and higher games. Big value bets even without a history with the villian Small stakes gamblers call because the are just that, gamblers Tony |
|
|