Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:00 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Default Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

Being able to double bet on 4th in 7cs8/b is a flaw, but one I think is advantageous to me.

But, I'm playing Omaha8/b, turn the nuts (no low out) with redraw to nut flush, I'm on the button, 7 way action,

SB bets out his last dollar all in, all call, and

I CAN ONLY CALL!

Ok I feel better now.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:04 AM
Tk79 Tk79 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

Are you saying that when someone bet a partial bet and was all in in a multiway pot you were unable to raise?

If so this happens to me on party from time to time as well. Very annoying.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:13 AM
IggyWH IggyWH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh - FIESTA BOWL BITCHES!
Posts: 317
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

This is actually a little known rule of Holdem. Not sure what you could search for to find old posts about this so maybe someone can explain better. I don't know why, but I know it is a rule.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:29 AM
theblitz theblitz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 51
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

[ QUOTE ]
This is actually a little known rule of Holdem. Not sure what you could search for to find old posts about this so maybe someone can explain better. I don't know why, but I know it is a rule.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are correct.

An all-in raise less than the minimum raise is not considered a raise and cannot be re-raised by the original bettor unless another player raised.

So, for example, EP bet 100, MP pushes in his 134. If LP just calls 134 then EP can only call.
However, if LP raises then EP can re-raise. LP is allowed to raise here because his bet is based on the EP.

There are some places where the "cut-off" is 50% of the required minimum. So, in the case above, if MP pushes 151 and LP calls then EP is allowed to re-raise.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:40 AM
Jim Kuhn Jim Kuhn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 1,034
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

In this case I don't think there was a raise? Only a partial bet. I think the op should have been able to raise.

Thank you,

Jim Kuhn
Catfish4u
[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:46 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

[ QUOTE ]
An all-in raise less than the minimum raise is not considered a raise and cannot be re-raised by the original bettor unless another player raised.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but this does not apply when the initial bettor is the one who is all in for less than the full bet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:57 AM
dibbs dibbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: east coast
Posts: 39
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

I remember the first time I signed on to this site I was baffled, it looked like it was from the early 90s or something. I did almost a complete retooling of the graphics (except for the buttons) and I admit it feels a lot better, but still clunky and having the flaws you mentioned. I've never had an issue with the hot keys (I dont even know what buttons they are) but some people on here really despise them as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2005, 07:56 AM
FlFishOn FlFishOn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

Buggy dogsh+t software. It made me crazy and I moved on. You can keep it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2005, 11:18 AM
joedot joedot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 84
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

When this is the case any bettor has the option to complete the bet. Not raise, but complete it to whatever the minimum bet is. The fact that Pacific does not allow you to do this shows what morons they are.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2005, 11:29 AM
Mike Haven Mike Haven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,288
Default Re: Ok I guess everyone is right , Pacific software sucks sucks

[ QUOTE ]
When this is the case any bettor has the option to complete the bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Then another player can raise the completed bet if they want to.

* * *

By the way, just received e-mail from them:

"On Monday, August 15 at 21:00 (PPT) or 9 PM Eastern Time we’ll be guaranteeing another $200,000 prize pool tournament!

Satellites start from as little as $1 + $0.10 or buy-in direct for only $150 + $15!"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.