Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Two Plus Two > Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:39 AM
bobdibble bobdibble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Muck
Posts: 86
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

I raise this too.

I don't have my SSH handy, but I could have sworn that Ed had an example where he advocates raising with A7s in a similar situation to clean up the A outs and advocates a call with a weaker flush draw that doesn't have overcards.

Edit: btw, the entire reason I came to the Magazine forum tonight was becuase when I read that article, I was shocked that a call was being advocated with the overcard and wanted to see if anyone else thought the same way [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-28-2005, 05:09 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

I think a case can be made for both lines. I don't mind the line for just calling here, I still like raising better.

In the SSHE example, p 158, if that's the one you're thinking of, it's a little different. You have a caller in between plus 2 overcards and a bigger pot. However, your raise is primarily to free up the Ace (as far as buying outs, which isn't the prime factor of that hand/raise given other, more beneficial factors also involved). You're not worried about your 9 outs as much as you will outkick most kickers unless they make 2 pair.

My contention is looking at the board on the hand. It's K high with only a flush draw. That flop didn't likely hit anyone unless they have a K or a flush draw, both which will call 2 flop bets. I don't see the pot really getting that much bigger given the board. You may also not gain much when you actually do hit your hand. Maybe. That can also be a case for calling the flop to see who might still be there to pay you off when you do hit. You're definitely not raising this turn if bet into if you get your flush.

However, another line I could see just calling the flop, see who comes along, then if you turn a gutshot draw, then raise the turn if bet into.

b
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-28-2005, 12:15 PM
shadow29 shadow29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 178
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

By calling on the flop, you're going to be raising the turn a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:26 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

[ QUOTE ]
By calling on the flop, you're going to be raising the turn a lot.

[/ QUOTE ]

I tend to agree, butI wouldn't necesarily be raising the turn when I hit my flush on the turn.

b
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:40 PM
shadow29 shadow29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 178
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

Right. I meant that if you don't hit on the turn, you'll be raising.

heh.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:51 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

I think that's a big mistake I see many, many players make.

b
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-28-2005, 05:01 PM
Stork Stork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Just a little bit to your left...
Posts: 65
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

[ QUOTE ]
I think a case can be made for both lines. I don't mind the line for just calling here, I still like raising better.

In the SSHE example, p 158, if that's the one you're thinking of, it's a little different. You have a caller in between plus 2 overcards and a bigger pot. However, your raise is primarily to free up the Ace (as far as buying outs, which isn't the prime factor of that hand/raise given other, more beneficial factors also involved). You're not worried about your 9 outs as much as you will outkick most kickers unless they make 2 pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just want to elaborate that the example in SSHE is VERY different. Firstly, the pot was raised preflop. Also, there are two limpers in between you and the raiser. Your raise is NOT primarily to clean up your lone overcard (putting 1SB in to buy 2 outs?). Your raise is for value, and because it may buy you a free river if the button folds and the turn is checked to you.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-29-2005, 12:08 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

Elaborate or summarize what I said?

[ QUOTE ]
Your raise is NOT primarily to clean up your lone overcard (putting 1SB in to buy 2 outs?).

[/ QUOTE ]

I mentioned that.

[ QUOTE ]
your raise is primarily to free up the Ace (as far as buying outs, which isn't the prime factor of that hand/raise given other, more beneficial factors also involved).

[/ QUOTE ]

However, that section is also about buying outs. Yes, those 2 outs.

Another factor is that there is a player in between you and the flop bettor. The preflop raiser is one of the people you are targetting to get out of the hand with the raise in that example since it is likely he can have a bigger A.

If you double the pot size, it's very close to that example spot to be in.

b
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-29-2005, 12:29 AM
Stork Stork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Just a little bit to your left...
Posts: 65
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

My bad, I sorta skimmed the parenthesis after " your raise is primarily to free up the Ace". Anyway, I still think a flop call is correct in the example the author posted, although it's pretty insignifigant either way, as long as you don't fold [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-29-2005, 01:05 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: Selective aggression hand I don\'t agree with.

[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, I still think a flop call is correct in the example the author posted, although it's pretty insignifigant either way, as long as you don't fold

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, in the book example, it's even more significant to raise in that spot. Pot size alone dictates trying to maximize your winning chances over gaining value.

b
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.