#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
Yes I would call the 40, and everything else that gets bet during this hand.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
Here are Goldeens moves: Peck, Tailwhip, Supersonic, HornAttack, Fury Attack, Waterfall, Horndrill, Agility.
Magikarp: Splash, tackle. Magikarps only value is in his evolution. Otherwise, Goldeen is the nuts vs Magikarp. -EV |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
[ QUOTE ]
PP 55. Villian is worse than a magikarp. Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t15 (10 handed) converter UTG (t1000) Hero (t1000) UTG+2 (t1765) MP1 (t985) MP2 (t955) MP3 (t960) CO (t1005) Button (t955) SB (t240) BB (t1135) Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t70</font>, <font color="#666666">6 folds</font>, SB calls t60, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>. Flop: (t152.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB bets t40 Hero? -EV Current Music: Eminem - Cleaning out my Closet PS: For those unacquainted with the wonderful world of pokemon, Magikarp is probably the most useless weak pokemon ever. [/ QUOTE ] On a previous thread, there was a debate as to whether 150 chips was enough to bother with a stop-and-go. I think we've answered that debate. Apparently 40 chips is enough for a stop and go. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
[ QUOTE ]
Here are Goldeens moves: Peck, Tailwhip, Supersonic, HornAttack, Fury Attack, Waterfall, Horndrill, Agility. Magikarp: Splash, tackle. Magikarps only value is in his evolution. Otherwise, Goldeen is the nuts vs Magikarp. -EV [/ QUOTE ] In other words, Magikarp is on a gut shot straight draw. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
Eve how old are you?
And when did you start playing pokemon? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
I am paying him off if he has a King. In my experience by betting the 40, this player has comitted the rest of his stack. There is almost no way to put him on a hand. It could as easly be 44 or JTs or KT...regardless I can afford to lose 240 more chips here if I am behind and more often than not I am ahead.
I raise to put him all in on the flop. Pay his King, personally I think it is more likely he does not have one. MrX |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
[ QUOTE ]
I raise to put him all in on the flop. Pay his King, personally I think it is more likely he does not have one. MrX [/ QUOTE ] Now that's just silly. If you really think he has junk why do you want to blow him off the hand? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
I really think he would call with almost anything after betting that 40.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
[ QUOTE ]
I really think he would call with almost anything after betting that 40. [/ QUOTE ] So call. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF_PWNED by small stack?
Hello brother [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I too despise those Magikarp fish.
|
|
|