|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No, it doesn\'t !!!
You have to find the optimal solution.
It doesn't matter wheter it is a repetitive game or a one time/occasional only. BB King’s ... formerly known as the pokerplayer formerly known as Jack |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No, it doesn\'t !!!
[ QUOTE ]
You have to find the optimal solution. It doesn't matter wheter it is a repetitive game or a one time/occasional only. BB King’s ... formerly known as the pokerplayer formerly known as Jack [/ QUOTE ] It does matter as to whether you should always just use the mathematically optimal solution if there is one or a mixed strategy with opponents who have previously seen how you play. This is similar to knowing in triple draw lowball the frequency with which your opponent will attempt to freeze you on a worse hand or stand pat on a bluff on the 2nd draw and bet out on the end. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No, it doesn\'t !!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You have to find the optimal solution. It doesn't matter wheter it is a repetitive game or a one time/occasional only. BB King’s ... formerly known as the pokerplayer formerly known as Jack [/ QUOTE ] It does matter as to whether you should always just use the mathematically optimal solution if there is one or a mixed strategy with opponents who have previously seen how you play. This is similar to knowing in triple draw lowball the frequency with which your opponent will attempt to freeze you on a worse hand or stand pat on a bluff on the 2nd draw and bet out on the end. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure D.S is looking for the game-theory sound way of playing. You can always adjust from that basic strategy according to your opponents tendencies. |
|
|