|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
stats for typical opponent at 5/10 and 10/20
I once asked here how many opponents people regarded as "decent" at each level. This question is more specific.
What do you think the "typical" or "average" opponents' stats look like at 5/10 and 10/20? I don't have a huge database, but I assume those that do could answer this question pretty easily. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stats for typical opponent at 5/10 and 10/20
[ QUOTE ]
I once asked here how many opponents people regarded as "decent" at each level. This question is more specific. What do you think the "typical" or "average" opponents' stats look like at 5/10 and 10/20? I don't have a huge database, but I assume those that do could answer this question pretty easily. [/ QUOTE ] The average opponent at 10/20 is something like 37/14, but I wouldn't say the "typical" player is like that. 10/20 is populated by a lot of TAGs (23/16) some laggier TAGs (30/20) some semiLAGs (40/20) and some really bad players (50+/x). It's been a few months since I played 5/10, but the "typical" opponent there was much more passive and less annoying to play against. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stats for typical opponent at 5/10 and 10/20
Yeah, I guess "typical" is a bit difficult to answer.
I guess if it means, "the type of player you run into most often", at the 5/10 "typical" would be something like 35-40/7-12. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stats for typical opponent at 5/10 and 10/20
[ QUOTE ]
The average opponent at 10/20 is something like 37/14, but I wouldn't say the "typical" player is like that. 10/20 is populated by a lot of TAGs (23/16) some laggier TAGs (30/20) some semiLAGs (40/20) and some really bad players (50+/x). [/ QUOTE ] Eek. No wonder everyone says 10/20 is much more difficult. Do these player types seem equally distributed? |
|
|