|
|
#32
06-21-2005, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: lurker request; DERB update!
[ QUOTE ]
The question isn't what are his overall stats. The question is what are his results since May 16th. - Andrew ww.pokerstove.com [/ QUOTE ] according to the HH datamining service @ pokerhandhistories his resuts during may are: hands: 4085 VPIP: 29.99 PFR: 18.14 WSD: 45.78% W$SD: 48.64% (keys are here to his play imo since he got a massive increase in WSD without dropping W$SD by a proportional amount...my #s are like 32% and 58% respectively) W$WSF: 40.65% (this is also huge, mine is 42% and he plays almost 2x as many hands) and he never folds his blinds...he folds bb to steal 28.74% of the time over this sample. results: 2.03bb/100 ... (st. dev = 24.920bb/100....mine is 15bb/100) -Barron 
|
|
#35
06-21-2005, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lurker request; DERB update!
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand your point. Yes, their hand range is wider if they are looser preflop, but you simply adjust for that fact postflop and <b> make the optimal play, given their expanded hand range. </b> They are making mistakes preflop, and I don't see how they can make up for that fact simply because you are unused to making the adjustment for their looseness. <b>Especially since there are plenty of loose players preflop in these games so you indeed are used to adjusting for preflop looseness</b>.... [/ QUOTE ] My point is that it is much more difficult to make a reasonable guess at what the optimal play is if the range of hands is wider. Its a fairly simple concept. The fact that I kill loose players that are bad postflop helps me little when attempting to assess the optimal play against a loose player who plays very well postflop. If I have some time, I'll try to post some actual hands that illustrate my point a little better.
|
|
#36
06-21-2005, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lurker request; DERB update!
Here is my stats on the derb in question:
Lojzka~{{H 93,205 - V 30 - R 17 - NF 21 - ag 2.0 ASB 37 - FSB 70 - FBB 30 - FBB-HU 24 WSD 41 - W$SD 50 - WF-T 3 - WF-R 3 CR 3 - W $144,657 - WR 3 - LS 04/29/2005}}> these stats are taken from a notefile that was given to me by my rakeback site. I dont know if they are filtered for shorthanded or not
|
|
#39
06-21-2005, 10:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lurker request; DERB update!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it has been posted on the forums if you are willing to search [/ QUOTE ] It's even been posted in this thread. [/ QUOTE ] DERB = Lojzka ? PairTheBoard
|
|
#40
06-21-2005, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lurker request; DERB update!
The W$SD figure here is what is so amazing. How is it possible to show down such a high percentage of winners when he is starting with average hands? That is the piece I cant understand and seems to only be able to be explained by luck. But how can luck continue for the same guy?
I can buy the part about running people over leading to a good win rate. But showing down winners? how can that be?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
