Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-10-2004, 03:10 PM
JayCo JayCo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 173
Default SLC Updates: Why I\'m not using the Suicide Climb rules

[ QUOTE ]
I kind of cheated.


[/ QUOTE ]

Cheated, shmeated- go for it however you want to. (But when we engrave your name on the OFFICIAL SLC Trophy it will have an asterisk [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])

Actually, what originally got me interested in reading/posting on 2+2 was the unofficial OIC that happened right before the one you described at TGC. Just like that original OIC based on LHE, I was actually going to do this as a "suicide/one-way-up ladder run"- once you hit 5x buy in you'd go up to the next level, and you'd never go down a rung. You'd just play each level until you're too broke, too nervous, or you make it to the next rung.

However, my memory of my OIC run is bitterweet- a glorious, dizzying headlong rush from $20 at $0.50-$1.00 straight up to the $15-$30 level, peaking at $1200+, followed by the big, bad Crash & Burn (aka returning to the mean and/or inevitable justice) bringing me all the way down to El Zippo in a few short hours. That's why I put in the Automatic Ladder Step-Down in the SLC when you go below 5 buy-ins... to save me from me.

If I make it all the way up to $200s this time, I'll bring in the Carnies to remove the safety gear and try it again without a net and try it that way too.

[ QUOTE ]

And for those saying the ROR is too high, not enough bankroll, etc. This is in the spirit of the OIC.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ya, mon!
(Even Damon-Rounders-wannabes know sometimes you can't always take the safe play.)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-10-2004, 03:13 PM
JayCo JayCo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 173
Default Re: SNG Ladder Challenge (SLC) - Updates

[ QUOTE ]
Not off to a great start. One fourth and one third.


[/ QUOTE ]
That's solid- beats my 10th and 8th.

[ QUOTE ]

The only reason I keep money at UB is that I can play there at work and I like to play on my lunch hour. I can't connect to any other sites.

[/ QUOTE ]
Thankfully, my current client has a firewall so I can't play at work. When people try to explain how I can get around it, I block my ears and say "naaaa, naaa naah"- I'm better off not knowing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-10-2004, 03:18 PM
JayCo JayCo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 173
Default SLC Updates: Notes

[ QUOTE ]
I suggest keeping tedious notes on every player you play with---it's amazing how after a week of sng's I can tell who's mini-betting with what and what it means when a player bets out however much on the flop [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]..at this level, players are calling early raises with anything

[/ QUOTE ]

You actually reminded me of one thing that has been hammered home to me from this. As a side effect of the 5 buy-in rule, I'm taking better notes & I think playing much better that I usually do with SNGs becuase I'm playing only 1 or 2 instead of 3 or 4.

[ QUOTE ]
Just moved up to $20's after starting with $100 and hitting $300.

[/ QUOTE ]
Nice- best of luck.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-10-2004, 03:52 PM
Milky Milky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 107
Default Re: SNG Ladder Challenge (SLC) - Updates

I played quite a bit on Pacific ($5.50 SnGs and the occasional .05/.10 ring game) and yes, the players are pretty nuts. I think I only had one connection issue while playing there for a few months but I guess I'm in the minority.

If you can't afford to buy-in over at PartyPoker, I'd definitely recommend Pacific as a starting point. They only require a minimum deposit of $20 and you can withdraw as little as $5 at a time (though cashouts take anywhere from 3-6 days on average). I built up my $20 on Pacific to $160 playing the 10 player SnGs (the payout structure is the same as PP) and then moved over to PP. Just thought I'd throw that out there, since I see a good amount of hate around for Pacific.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-11-2004, 11:38 PM
JayCo JayCo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 173
Default SLC Updates - any data on bust-out distribution by SNG level?

So I'm a bit stuck at the $50 rung, but still getting short-term results above my head and hanging in nicely.

I reviewed HHs for my Out-of-The-Moneys in the $50s and at least 3 of them were overly LAGgy play on my part.

Obviously too early to tell, but my best guess is that in the $50s I'm not adjusting to the extra chips and more patient pool of SNG players. My normal aggression at the $50-$100 blind levels is more suited to the lower buy-in SNGs due to the reduced T800 start and the fact that by level 4 there seem to be fewer bust-outs.

I've read lots of anecdotal "lots of crazy LAGs bust out in the $5s and $10s". Has anyone collected any data on how many players are typically left at the start of each level for different DNG buy-ins?

J

SNG Finishes: 50% ITM, 43% ROI, Avg=4.3

1) $30, $5+$1, 10 -> $24
2) $24, $5+$1, 8 -> $18
...
15) $115, $20+$2, 1 -> $193
UP to $30 rung: 16) $193, $30+$3, 6 -> $160
DOWN to $20 rung: 17) $160, $20+$2, 1 -> $238
UP to $30 rung: 18) $238, $30+$3, 1 -> $355
UP to $50 rung: 19) $355, $50+$5, 8 -> $300
20) $300, $50+$5, 6 -> $245
DOWN to $30 rung: 21) $245, $30+$3, 3 -> $272
22) $272, $30+$3, 9 -> $239
23) $239, $30+$3, 1 -> $356
UP to $50 rung: 24) $356, $50+$5, 6 -> $301
25) $301, $50+$5, 1 -> $496
26) $496, $50+$5, 5 -> $441
27) $441, $50+$5, 6 -> $386
28) $386, $50+$5, ???
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.