|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Most hated poster? | |||
| citanul |
   
|
42 | 100.00% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
07-23-2005, 11:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Harrington or Raymer?
Who, in your opinion had a better back to back performance at the WSOP ME, Harrington's two final tables (3rd/800+ and 4th/2500+), or Raymers win/2500+ and 25th/5600+?
|
|
#2
07-23-2005, 12:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington or Raymer?
and why?
I have to go with Raymer, two record fields, $5,300,000 cashed, a bracelet, i'm envious.
|
|
#6
07-23-2005, 12:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington or Raymer?
[ QUOTE ]
Who, in your opinion had a better back to back performance at the WSOP ME [/ QUOTE ] Johny Chan... wait, he isn't in the poll? gay
|
|
#7
07-23-2005, 01:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington or Raymer?
[ QUOTE ]
Went w/ Raymer since he also went deep in one of the earlier events w/ 2,000+ people. From a career WSOP perspective, no doubt Dan, 4 final tables, 1 win. Greg still has time though. [/ QUOTE ] FYP
|
|
#8
07-23-2005, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington or Raymer?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who, in your opinion had a better back to back performance at the WSOP ME [/ QUOTE ] Johny Chan... wait, he isn't in the poll? gay [/ QUOTE ] Johnny [censored] Chan. Oh wait, he's more like back to back to back. Never mind.
|
|
#9
07-23-2005, 01:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington or Raymer?
I went with Raymer - but they were both very impressive.
If you really want to be impressed, consider this: Over a twelve year period from 1976 to 1988, Jesse Alto made the main event final table six times! Yes, SIX! If he had won one of the them, he would be a poker god. Instead, his finishes of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 9th are virtually unknown. Bummer. Hell of a player and a good guy. Dogmeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
