Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:05 PM
bigalt bigalt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 287
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

new math. it's so simple, only a kid can do it!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:07 PM
ihardlyknowher ihardlyknowher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All-in on a draw.
Posts: 213
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

It's a 6:2 (or 3:1) proposition. This is 25%, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, it's 33%, since you have to win one time for every three times you lose.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is 4 times total. You need to win 1 in 4 times = 25%.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:17 PM
pleyya pleyya is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lund
Posts: 67
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

[ QUOTE ]
On the turn, you only need to be ahead >25% of the time for a calldown to be right.

[/ QUOTE ]
Actually you can be ahead a little less than 25 % since you have 4 outs that should be good.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:17 PM
ElAnimal ElAnimal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 90
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but I believe they were TAGs, maybe TANs.

[/ QUOTE ]
2 TAGs limping one, two in EP?!? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I'm raising.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I don't understand something about making that play. The reason I didn't raise was because the limpers were fairly tight and not overly passive. Since you indicated that the type of player had an impact on whether or not you raise in this spot, what type of limpers would keep you from raising?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:18 PM
Lurkmaster Flex Lurkmaster Flex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Holding Out
Posts: 56
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

I don't see the value in calling this down. If you had an overpair yea, but you have 2nd pair and 3rd pair by the river. Even if he was donking something like a flush draw he is still capable of drawing out with something else, ie that king that hit. 40 hands isn't a "solid" read as people would say but .8 over 40 isn't helping me lean closer to a calldown. HU yea call down, but donking into 2 people, eh.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:21 PM
ihardlyknowher ihardlyknowher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All-in on a draw.
Posts: 213
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On the turn, you only need to be ahead >25% of the time for a calldown to be right.

[/ QUOTE ]
Actually you can be ahead a little less than 25 % since you have 4 outs that should be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

So I am not smoking crack on the math? Those guys had me second guessing myself.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:24 PM
mscags mscags is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Between Two Hot Twins
Posts: 713
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

I think I'm bailing on the turn here. I'm not sure if I even bet this flop. Usually when there is just one overcard to my PP I don't have a problem betting the flop, but when it is an ace and it is 4-6way action you can almost be assured someone is playing Ace crap, thats just me and could be weak tight [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:34 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

When 2 TAGs limp in EP I'm raising to isolate them and expecting to take the pot down on many, many flops.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:35 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

[ QUOTE ]
what type of limpers would keep you from raising?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd be more inclined to limp if they were the loose/passive/calling-station types that are going to showdown with a pair of 8's.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-22-2005, 12:38 PM
pleyya pleyya is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lund
Posts: 67
Default Re: (77) with four to a straight on board

no the math was right i think, if youre getting 3:1 (6:2) youll break even if you win one and lose three
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.