|
|
#101
10-26-2005, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who won that huge KK vs QJ vs 29 hand?
What happened to the one freaking night a week for limit poker?
|
|
#102
10-26-2005, 11:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who won that huge KK vs QJ vs 29 hand?
He never does.
Next week he'll probably bluff it all away again. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#103
10-26-2005, 11:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/26) (50/100 NL)
Shirley, if you will recall what Barry Gold, er, I mean Greenstein said, one should always make the same bet in the same situation, regardless of whether it is a "value bet", a bluff, or whatever other names you might assign. Barry he knows his stuff.
|
|
#104
10-26-2005, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
FYP
CW - what does FYP mean in people's posts
|
|
#105
10-26-2005, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/26) (50/100 NL)
[ QUOTE ]
And seat 9 is NOT 2+2's El Diablo. [/ QUOTE ] who is this imposter?
|
|
#108
10-26-2005, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FYP
ahhhhh
thanx
|
|
#109
10-26-2005, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/26) (50/100 NL)
The probability of getting called by a lesser hand is not the end of it. Of course a rational player is more apt to call a smaller bet. But getting called once for a large bet can more than make up for several small wins. Most importantly, when you vary the size of your bets, at worst you send your opponent coded messages as to what you have, and at best you turn the game into ro-sham-bo. "Let's see. He bet small with the nuts last time, so this time he probably doesn't have much when he bets small. I'll go scissors."
|
|
#110
10-26-2005, 11:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"Official\" Live at the Bike thread (10/26) (50/100 NL)
I think Barry Greenstein was referring to Limit Hold em Jive [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
