Someone explain the rules of poker to me.

[zipppy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm curious to know if that would be true. I don't think it would/should be.


[/ QUOTE ]

What if I raise to 149 and some guy behind me raises all-in in to 150, which is essentially a call? Should I really be allowed to push after some people call? It seems like that would be abuseable

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I don't think so, which is what the point of my post was.

Edit: To be more accurate, the point of my post was that I don't think someone should ever be allowed to reraise over an allin after they've already acted unless someone else reraises, which includes the times that someone goes allin for less than a full raise.

[valenzuela]

the rules make sense to me.
You have KK and 1000 chips and bet 100.
The guy with 44 calls.( he has 1000 chips as well)
The shorty with A7 goes all-in for his last 130
And now you want to reraise??? Doesnt seem fair to me.

[Exitonly]

you made the bet 150, he made it 260, i don't see why you owuldn't be able to raise... the minraise in that situation would be to 250, the short stack more than covered it.

What's the deal?

[bawcerelli]

to put it another way. what if the short stack just minraised to 250 instead of going all in? you certainly would be able to reraise, but you can't reraise at 260? doens't make sense.

[valenzuela]

[ QUOTE ]
you made the bet 150, he made it 260, i don't see why you owuldn't be able to raise... the minraise in that situation would be to 250, the short stack more than covered it.

What's the deal?

[/ QUOTE ]

Im an idiot that didnt even read the OP, anyway i think the OP should send an email to party or wherever he was playing.

[tjh]

This page from the RGP FAQ sums it up rather nicely. And it seems like either your site differs from these rules or your numbers that you used as an example are not accurate.

RGP FAQ