Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2005, 07:43 PM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default Set problem...

The main villian in this hand (UTG+2) is a fairly tight player:

24.44% VP$IP, PF Raise % = 2.22.

However it's only 44 hands worth of data. He also seems to underbet a lot.

It appears the other player (UTG+1) calling is a chaser, but short-stacked.

What would you do after the following sequence?

All comments appreciated.

Thanks,

Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (10 handed) converter

MP1 ($211)
MP2 ($670.80)
MP3 ($611.40)
Garland ($459.90)
Button ($337)
SB ($206.70)
BB ($324)
UTG ($120.10)
UTG+1 ($125.10)
UTG+2 ($488.60)

Preflop: Garland is CO with 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG+1 calls $4, UTG+2 calls $4, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Garland calls $4, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB checks.

Flop: ($18) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, Garland checks.

Turn: ($18) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 bets $15</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Garland raises to $40</font>, BB folds, UTG+1 calls $40, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 raises to $65</font>, Garland ????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2005, 07:59 PM
lennytheduck lennytheduck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: Set problem...

Ack, this is a gross spot to be in.

1. Bet the flop with bottom set.
2. I think you can put UTG+1 on some sort of drawing hand, considering his style from your previous observations and his cold call.
3. Would UTG+2 limp TT? Is he a TAP in general?

Overall, I have a hard time raising in this spot. You certainly don't want to fold, and calling doesn't seem like the best thing either, but I think it is best. Try to get to showdown cheap on the river. If a diamond or a 5 hits and you see action from UTG+1, you have an easy fold.

Hope it worked out.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2005, 08:20 PM
edge edge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: Set problem...

I'd be much more concerned with a 7 or 2 than a 5. Why did you check the flop last to act? Betting there isn't giving your hand away at all, and it builds the pot if anyone calls.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2005, 09:22 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Set problem...

I reraise to $200 straight.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2005, 09:28 PM
Sobolous Sobolous is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: Set problem...

i cant fathom the check on the flop in a 4 way pot. i'd rather bet out and take a small pot here than give a free card that builds the pot for someone else.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2005, 09:41 PM
youngin20 youngin20 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 77
Default Re: Set problem...

call. then dump it on the river if you dont fill up. i feel like this is a math problem. he basically is giving you pot odds if you are behind, and i dont see him betting huge on ther river. there is a bit of money in the pot, and its three way. i dont see UTG folding, so...put that money in there. reraising will just get you reraised again..i think
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2005, 09:50 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Set problem...

[ QUOTE ]
call. then dump it on the river if you dont fill up. i feel like this is a math problem. he basically is giving you pot odds if you are behind, and i dont see him betting huge on ther river. there is a bit of money in the pot, and its three way. i dont see UTG folding, so...put that money in there. reraising will just get you reraised again..i think

[/ QUOTE ]

You must be kidding. You think villain has 52?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-29-2005, 10:07 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: Set problem...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
call. then dump it on the river if you dont fill up. i feel like this is a math problem. he basically is giving you pot odds if you are behind, and i dont see him betting huge on ther river. there is a bit of money in the pot, and its three way. i dont see UTG folding, so...put that money in there. reraising will just get you reraised again..i think

[/ QUOTE ]

You must be kidding. You think villain has 52?

[/ QUOTE ]no... 57. or 33. i would just call.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-29-2005, 10:23 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Set problem...

Hmmm, I didnt see it was still a 3 way pot here. That changes things quite a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-30-2005, 05:40 AM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: Set problem...

[ QUOTE ]
The main villian in this hand (UTG+2) is a fairly tight player:

24.44% VP$IP, PF Raise % = 2.22.

However it's only 44 hands worth of data. He also seems to underbet a lot.

It appears the other player (UTG+1) calling is a chaser, but short-stacked.

What would you do after the following sequence?

All comments appreciated.

Thanks,

Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (10 handed) converter

MP1 ($211)
MP2 ($670.80)
MP3 ($611.40)
Garland ($459.90)
Button ($337)
SB ($206.70)
BB ($324)
UTG ($120.10)
UTG+1 ($125.10)
UTG+2 ($488.60)

Preflop: Garland is CO with 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG+1 calls $4, UTG+2 calls $4, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Garland calls $4, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB checks.

Flop: ($18) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, Garland checks.

Turn: ($18) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 bets $15</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Garland raises to $40</font>, BB folds, UTG+1 calls $40, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 raises to $65</font>, Garland ????

[/ QUOTE ]

I think going into calldown mode is best.

He could be on fool's-AA or 33, but beyond that I don't see what you beat. Still, the pot odds he's laying you can't be beat.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.