|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meta-Analysis Reminder/Update
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Thanks for taking the trouble to do this, I'm eager to see the results! (I would have participated myself but I didn't qualify when you started soliciting.) [/ QUOTE ] I'm in the same boat as a 10-tabler. Also eager to see the results. I think leaving out 55s and below 10-tabling may be an oversight, as after extensively doing both, playing 8 & playing 10 are not that different in the 55s (the overwhelming bulk of my play). In the 109s, I think there is a difference between 8 & 10 though, but that's anecdotal experience and I don't think I will try 10 enough to find out. [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something?....Irieguy's request for participants made no mention of either of your criteria? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meta-Analysis Reminder/Update
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Thanks for taking the trouble to do this, I'm eager to see the results! (I would have participated myself but I didn't qualify when you started soliciting.) [/ QUOTE ] I'm in the same boat as a 10-tabler. Also eager to see the results. I think leaving out 55s and below 10-tabling may be an oversight, as after extensively doing both, playing 8 & playing 10 are not that different in the 55s (the overwhelming bulk of my play). In the 109s, I think there is a difference between 8 & 10 though, but that's anecdotal experience and I don't think I will try 10 enough to find out. [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something?....Irieguy's request for participants made no mention of either of your criteria? [/ QUOTE ] From Irie's Original Post: [ QUOTE ] 4. You play at least 4, and no more than 8 SNG tables at once when you play. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 10+ tablers make up too small a percentage of SNG players. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why does this matter? They're still playing SnGs and there's no significant difference between how they play and how 8-tablers play. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That is totally untrue in my experience. [/ QUOTE ] Edit: My point was that there may well indeed be a difference between 8 & 10 tabling at the 109s+, but I do not believe this to be the case at the 55s + below. Alas, it is not my project, so I respect his decision to run it the way he will, though I am excluded since my primary game is 10-tabling the 55s. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meta-Analysis Reminder/Update
My Bad [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meta-Analysis Reminder/Update
I can definately drag your results down some if you want them, but I will have less than 500, somewhere around 400.
I'm not sure if i'm on the list, so it's your call. My results where also heavily influenced by my playing like crap lately due largely to my meds going ineffective on me, and me putting off going to see the dam doc for a month too long (way, way, WAY too long) Good news is the higher dose seems to be working, and I will be able to provide a negative sample if you want it, thus restoring your faith in people's willingness to embarrass themselves. True, that public service is not worth the $8000+ I'm down this month, but it's something... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meta-Analysis Reminder/Update
[ QUOTE ]
I can definately drag your results down some if you want them, but I will have less than 500, somewhere around 400. I'm not sure if i'm on the list, so it's your call. My results where also heavily influenced by my playing like crap lately due largely to my meds going ineffective on me, and me putting off going to see the dam doc for a month too long (way, way, WAY too long) Good news is the higher dose seems to be working, and I will be able to provide a negative sample if you want it, thus restoring your faith in people's willingness to embarrass themselves. True, that public service is not worth the $8000+ I'm down this month, but it's something... [/ QUOTE ] Time for another final week comeback? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meta-Analysis Reminder/Update
not likely. Most of that 8k is from mtt's. I'm demoralized to the point I'm gonna 8 tables 55's 50 hours a week till I've regrouped. I desperately need a low risk high return activity right now. It's leather ass, pay the rent time....
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Time is up!
Ok, just in case anybody missed their PM or forgot, or whatever...
If you agreed to participate in the meta-analysis by sending me your "I agree" PM, it is time to submit your results. The sooner I get all of the individual results, the sooner I can post the combined results, which should be tens of thousands of SNGs. Thank you all, Irieguy |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time is up!
I'm out of town. I'll get it in tomorrow night if I get the chance.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time is up!
[ QUOTE ]
I'm out of town. I'll get it in tomorrow night if I get the chance. [/ QUOTE ] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time is up!
I profited on this ish. ehot?
|
|
|