wuts ur longest cash streak..........and my 1st thread....yay!!!!!

[codewarrior]

My point is probability is not time dependant. Or maybe I don't have a point.

What are the odds of flopping a set? Do they change because you are playing 8 hands at once?

[Myst]

[ QUOTE ]
My point is probability is not time dependant. Or maybe I don't have a point.

What are the odds of flopping a set? Do they change because you are playing 8 hands at once?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, we understand That. YOU ARE CORRECT. I AM ALSO CORRECT. Leave at that. Jeez.

[nWirb]

This is from 4 tabling the 22's.
Copied straight from spreadsheet.

SNG# DATE DAY TIME PLACING DURATION
214 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 1 40
215 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 1 53
216 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 3 41
217 19-Jul Tu 2:43 AM 1 54
218 19-Jul Tu 2:43 AM 1 43
219 19-Jul Tu 2:45 AM 2 47
220 19-Jul Tu 2:46 AM 1 52
221 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 54
222 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 48
223 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 42
224 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 55
225 22-Jul Fr 4:33 AM 2 35

I'd like some more of this kind of streak.

[Psy_Mike]

Ya lets leave it at that [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

And no the odds don't change, but you'll be seeing more sets than someone single-tabling if you play over a few hours [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[prepotency]

Actually, the chance of hitting a streak grows with the number of tables you play at once (assuming that you do not start another table until your set of games is done). This is because if you are playing 14 tables simultaneously, and we assume you have a 50%ITM average, you might place in 7 tables. The reason this would be a "streak" is because the games where you finish ITM are likely to be longer games than if you bust out in 8th place for example. Meaning (if you can keep your ITM% up as you increase the number of tables you play) you will thus increase the number of tables that you can place consecutively in a "streak".

G

[codewarrior]

All caps - you lose.

J/K... [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

You should be honored - I didn't call anyone a doughtnut puncher in this thread [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[pooh74]

[ QUOTE ]
Actually, the chance of hitting a streak grows with the number of tables you play at once (assuming that you do not start another table until your set of games is done). This is because if you are playing 14 tables simultaneously, and we assume you have a 50%ITM average, you might place in 7 tables. The reason this would be a "streak" is because the games where you finish ITM are likely to be longer games than if you bust out in 8th place for example. Meaning (if you can keep your ITM% up as you increase the number of tables you play) you will thus increase the number of tables that you can place consecutively in a "streak".

G

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the dubest thread Ive seen in a while...beside's codewarrior, you guys are all talking past eachother and speaking verbal vomit.

If you multitable, SNGs should be recorded by their start time, not finish...so there goes that dumb theory.

Multitablers dont have a better chance of a streak over x amount of games than a single tabler over x games. As one genius pointed out, the likelihood of an ITM streak of y games over 10,000 sngs is greater than one over 100 games...thanks, but what does that have to do with multitabling?

ugh

[pooh74]

[ QUOTE ]
Ya ofc, but that's not interesting since that will almost never be the case.

A multi-tabler will more often run into a streak than a single-tabler and will ofc have a larger chance of having a longer streak if you use a time intervall instead of looking at a set number of SnGs.

[/ QUOTE ]

????????!!!!

Why would you NOT look at a set # of SNGs? That's like saying I am going to measure your height while you are sitting down and measure your weight while you're in the pool...

cut it out!

josh

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Actually, the chance of hitting a streak grows with the number of tables you play at once (assuming that you do not start another table until your set of games is done). This is because if you are playing 14 tables simultaneously, and we assume you have a 50%ITM average, you might place in 7 tables. The reason this would be a "streak" is because the games where you finish ITM are likely to be longer games than if you bust out in 8th place for example. Meaning (if you can keep your ITM% up as you increase the number of tables you play) you will thus increase the number of tables that you can place consecutively in a "streak".

G

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the dubest thread Ive seen in a while...beside's codewarrior, you guys are all talking past eachother and speaking verbal vomit.

If you multitable, SNGs should be recorded by their start time, not finish...so there goes that dumb theory.

Multitablers dont have a better chance of a streak over x amount of games than a single tabler over x games. As one genius pointed out, the likelihood of an ITM streak of y games over 10,000 sngs is greater than one over 100 games...thanks, but what does that have to do with multitabling?

ugh

[/ QUOTE ]

nh.

[ QUOTE ]
This is from 4 tabling the 22's.
Copied straight from spreadsheet.

SNG# DATE DAY TIME PLACING DURATION
214 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 1 40
215 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 1 53
216 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 3 41
217 19-Jul Tu 2:43 AM 1 54
218 19-Jul Tu 2:43 AM 1 43
219 19-Jul Tu 2:45 AM 2 47
220 19-Jul Tu 2:46 AM 1 52
221 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 54
222 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 48
223 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 42
224 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 55
225 22-Jul Fr 4:33 AM 2 35


[/ QUOTE ]

JESUS!

6 straight for me, mostly 3rds : puke :

[mlagoo]

My longest streak was 9 games, and went 3rd, 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 3rd, 2nd.

Those were back in my luckbox days.