|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
I think there's a much bigger skill difference between the $60's and $114's than the $27's to the $60's, though I guess it's a matter of opinion to some degree.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
So the $60 are beatable?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
I'm probably breakeven, and I have a ton of leaks (working out primarily at the $27s now).
God I wish I could learn how to get even the simplest point across w/o parentheses (probably says something about my disjointed thought process). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
Sure, any game is beatable. I don't keep the best stats in the world, but I've beaten the $60's pretty significantly (well over 10%, and probably closer to 15-18% over thousands while multitabling). I've taken shots at the $114's on occasion, though not recently, and I'm convinced that my hourly is optimal at the $60's because I'm not comfortable playing more than four tables higher than that at once.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
I have found from my limited playing experience on Stars turbos that the game seem to contain more good players and less 'fish' is this a fair assesment?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
Don't know, I'm not familiar with the games at Party to compare. I promise you'll find your share of donks at Stars too.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbos = PP $?
Well i guess i be back to Stars in the new year.
and i will avoid you [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
|