|
|
#31
12-20-2005, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I can't remember, but I think a BDS is 1 out. We may be splitting or "splitting by three" (is there a word for that?) the straight though, so I'd give us something like 0.65 for it rather than 1. [/ QUOTE ] I think .65 is too low, I'd guess about twice that. [/ QUOTE ] FYI, I was using the number given to me on page 103 in SSHE (I had to look it up just to make sure before posting). I double-checked this with a pot-odds chart I made in excel, and it is indeed about 1 out. I'm cutting it down a bit because we win half the pot when we split, and we don't split all the time... I figure about 0.65 is a reasonable number here. The page also shows the exact math behind it. 
|
|
#32
12-20-2005, 03:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
[23:53] Entity: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...;gonew=1#UNREAD
[23:53] Entity: w3e are drunk [23:53] Entity: but I think I like the way he played htis [23:55] jason_t: yeah of course [23:55] jason_t: i don't get it [23:55] Entity: don't get what? [23:55] Entity: PF? [23:55] Entity: flop? [23:55] Entity: turn? [23:55] jason_t: pf standard imo [23:55] jason_t: flop standard imo [23:55] jason_t: turn standard imo [23:55] jason_t: yes [23:55] jason_t: starndard [23:55] jason_t: i don't get it [23:55] Entity: pqoiwejf;lkj [23:55] Entity: h8h8 [23:55] jason_t: wtf [23:56] Entity: ahaha [23:56] Entity: I think it's standard too [23:56] jason_t: LOL [23:56] jason_t: h8 [23:56] jason_t: 'er [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
|
|
#33
12-20-2005, 03:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
[ QUOTE ]
[23:53] Entity: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...;gonew=1#UNREAD [23:53] Entity: w3e are drunk [23:53] Entity: but I think I like the way he played htis [23:55] jason_t: yeah of course [23:55] jason_t: i don't get it [23:55] Entity: don't get what? [23:55] Entity: PF? [23:55] Entity: flop? [23:55] Entity: turn? [23:55] jason_t: pf standard imo [23:55] jason_t: flop standard imo [23:55] jason_t: turn standard imo [23:55] jason_t: yes [23:55] jason_t: starndard [23:55] jason_t: i don't get it [23:55] Entity: pqoiwejf;lkj [23:55] Entity: h8h8 [23:55] jason_t: wtf [23:56] Entity: ahaha [23:56] Entity: I think it's standard too [23:56] jason_t: LOL [23:56] jason_t: h8 [23:56] jason_t: 'er [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] h8.
|
|
#34
12-20-2005, 03:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
[ QUOTE ]
FYI, I was using the number given to me on page 103 in SSHE [/ QUOTE ] It says straights with no gaps are worth about the same as a flush draw. One-gappers are the ones worth 1 out, not this one.
|
|
#36
12-20-2005, 03:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
OOC?
btw, i think domination is fairly irrelevant here. we are playing this for straight and flush
|
|
#38
12-20-2005, 03:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
i just about pissed myself laughing at that chat log
|
|
#39
12-20-2005, 03:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TQs BB. Standard?
[ QUOTE ]
IIRC, a LONG time ago we had a discussion where I talked about checking AJo in the BB vs 6 limpers, and you said that since I had a PF pokerstove edge I should push it now. I [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't raise AJo but I'd raise AJs and ATs and QTs and T9s and all sorts of suited hands. Your equity is better and you've got a better chance of realizing your full equity with a suited connector than you do with an offsuit broadway. Your RIE is a lot worse with AJo than with QTs. Postflop it's pretty effing good, and if he can play like this postflop he can definitely raise this preflop. On a rainbow flop there's a chance I would lead (esp. with a BD diamond draw) but I don't hate a check at all.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
