|
|
#41
11-11-2005, 02:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
No offense, but I don't consider a 12% SNG ROI to be "beating" anything. Randomly, you should be ITM 30% of the time. To my mind, the threshhold of "beating" them is a 50% increase over the average, or 45% ITM. At 45% ITM spread evenly over the 3 payout spots (assuming a 10-handed table), your ROI should be 36%. [/ QUOTE ] I can see this argument for 11's, but not 55's "beating" is a relative term 
|
|
#43
11-11-2005, 03:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
I beat the 55s for 12% No offense, but I don't consider a 12% SNG ROI to be "beating" anything. Randomly, you should be ITM 30% of the time. To my mind, the threshhold of "beating" them is a 50% increase over the average, or 45% ITM. At 45% ITM spread evenly over the 3 payout spots (assuming a 10-handed table), your ROI should be 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Semantics...
|
|
#44
11-11-2005, 03:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So the only one beating the game is Stanzee? Wow! Klingon math can be so enlightening. [/ QUOTE ] freemoney is beating the game too. [/ QUOTE ] So are "T.O.W., Kyro, TRex, and gOOt [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#45
11-11-2005, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
12% ROI equates to about 37% ITM. That's better than average and nothing to sneeze at. <shrug> maybe I just interpret "beating the game" as having a different meaning.
FWIW, I realize as you move up to the higher levels, 45/36 ITM/ROI might be a pipe dream, but at only 12%, I'd still be looking for the leaks.
|
|
#46
11-11-2005, 03:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] So the only one beating the game is Stanzee? Wow! Klingon math can be so enlightening. [/ QUOTE ] freemoney is beating the game too. [/ QUOTE ] So are "T.O.W., Kyro, TRex, and gOOt [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Kyro's not a troll...and I am sure he is way ahead...he has posted here for a long time...no one posts about hands for that long just for the fun of it. T.O.W, however, was an annoying hippie. (hippies don't make money)
|
|
#47
11-11-2005, 03:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
I think you are confusing "beating" and "crushing".
I would think that "beating" the game means you can maintain a +ROI over thousands of tourneys. I can see applying your logic to someone who says they are "crushing" the game.
|
|
#49
11-11-2005, 03:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
Fair enough
|
|
#50
11-11-2005, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I beat the 55s for 12% No offense, but I don't consider a 12% SNG ROI to be "beating" anything. Randomly, you should be ITM 30% of the time. To my mind, the threshhold of "beating" them is a 50% increase over the average, or 45% ITM. At 45% ITM spread evenly over the 3 payout spots (assuming a 10-handed table), your ROI should be 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Semantics... [/ QUOTE ] What would 2+2 be without the occaisional beef over semantics. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
