The Conundrum of Ugly and/or Fat Chicks

[Homer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
to have your kids.

[/ QUOTE ]

why didnt god just make all chicks hot? wouldn't that be better, evolutionary wise?

[/ QUOTE ]

if all chicks were hot, then no chicks would be hot. do you see why?

[KaneKungFu123]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
to have your kids.

[/ QUOTE ]

why didnt god just make all chicks hot? wouldn't that be better, evolutionary wise?

[/ QUOTE ]

IMO, all chicks can't be equally hot unless they all look the same, and that would be incredibly bland.

[/ QUOTE ]

you know what i meant. they would be equally hot, but not all the same looking.

[einbert]

[ QUOTE ]
you know what i meant. they would be equally hot, but not all the same looking.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I didn't understand exactly what you meant, but what I was trying to say is that I don't understand exactly how they can be equally hot but not all the same looking.

It would also depend on your personal preference, some people prefer woman A over woman B but others it's vice versa.

In all it probably comes down to the fact that we are programmed to pick "good" mates and for some reason certain physical qualities jump out at us as "good" for whatever reason.

More likely it's a societal thing, I think.

But yeah, back to my original point. I really don't think it's possible that you can have a ton of women who look different but are all considered equally hot. You would find something about some of the women to make them seem hotter than the others.

[Alobar]

[ QUOTE ]

But yeah, back to my original point. I really don't think it's possible that you can have a ton of women who look different but are all considered equally hot. You would find something about some of the women to make them seem hotter than the others.

[/ QUOTE ]

but they would still all be hot, which is what I think he was trying to say.

[kurosh]

Maybe you should stick to the mid-high NL forum?

[mmbt0ne]

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
why didnt god just make all chicks hot?

[/ QUOTE ]

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
wouldn't that be better, evolutionary wise?

[/ QUOTE ]

?

[coffeecrazy1]

"Oh, won't you take me home tonight?
Oh, down beside that red firelight...
Oh, you gonna let it all hang out,
Fat bottomed girls, you make the rockin' world go 'round."
-Queen

Seriously, though...it's to balance out some of the extremely ugly guys, so they can get a little, too.

[einbert]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

But yeah, back to my original point. I really don't think it's possible that you can have a ton of women who look different but are all considered equally hot. You would find something about some of the women to make them seem hotter than the others.

[/ QUOTE ]

but they would still all be hot, which is what I think he was trying to say.

[/ QUOTE ]
Let me try to state my perspective from a numbers POV.

Let's assume that right now women are somewhat "normally" distributed according to a hotness of 0-10. So, if this happened I guess we could say that all the 0-5's would be zapped into nothingness, and we would be left with the 6-10's. So, now a 6 is the bottom of the food chain instead of middle class. If you thought a 6 was hot before, do you think she is ugly now that she is hotter than basically noone? Or do you just think that everyone is beautiful.

On the flip side, if all the 6-10's in the world were suddenly gone, 5's and 4's would begin to look hot. Hotness is just a totally relative term.

Even if you got rid of all the 0-8's, you would still have a lot of 9's and 10's, and the hottest 10's would quickly be sorted out from the ugliest 9's, IMO.

In fact I believe that something like this would take place:
The old 0-10 scale would be redistributed based on the remaining women. So if you got rid of all the 0-5's a 6 would now be a 1 and a 7.5 would now be a 5 (relative to the population).

Do you guys think that if the 0-5's all were suddenly gone, phrases like "ugly" and "unattractive" would just go out the window? This is probably one reasonable hypothesis, but I disagree with it if that is what you are saying.


Another way to look at this problem, is to say that well it's your fault because you're calling them ugly. If you chose to, you could scale all women from "reasonably attractive" to "very hot" rather than from "very ugly" to "very hot" or whatever it is now.

Pretty interesting thing to consider, in any case.

[einbert]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why didnt god just make all chicks hot?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't that be better, evolutionary wise?

[/ QUOTE ]

?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because God and evolution cannot possibly coexist in the same hypothetical universe? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[CallMeIshmael]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why didnt god just make all chicks hot?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't that be better, evolutionary wise?

[/ QUOTE ]

?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because God and evolution cannot possibly coexist in the same hypothetical universe? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]