Anna Kournikova

[masse75]

With his reraise on the river (now knowing he's not that aggressive), I call the three bet, fearing a chop or worst case KQ.

I would go ahead and 3 bet the flop, if he has king he's likely going to lead the turn or cap the flop.

On the river I probably just call the 3 bet, but against a huge donkey (even a passive one), I don't think a cap is really that bad.

imo the river cap pretty much ev neutral.... the rest is fine

[marchron]

[ QUOTE ]
With his reraise on the river (now knowing he's not that aggressive), I call the three bet, fearing a chop or worst case KQ.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have top kicker, there can't be a chop.

[MN_Mime]

You have exclusive rights to AK?

[moa]

Ok, im not a stat expert, but from what I understand, 0.8 isn't that low considering he plays so many hands. I mean when you play 50%+ hands, you can't go all that crazy or you're playing like a maniac. I like the river cap, because he's paying you off with [censored] kickers a lot.

[nomadtla]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, im not a stat expert, but from what I understand, 0.8 isn't that low considering he plays so many hands. I mean when you play 50%+ hands, you can't go all that crazy or you're playing like a maniac. I like the river cap, because he's paying you off with [censored] kickers a lot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here is a thread that will help get an esstimate. For this math question.

I'm deffinately not capping that river. I think maybe if he had an AF >1.5 I could understand it but I don't see any hand 3 betting that river after all our aggression that we beat. The possible split hand may be played this way. But if he had AK and posted his hand I don't think I'd like his 3 bet either.

As far as geting AF on Gametime, if it's the gametime that comes with PT then you can't do it. Go get GT+ if you don't want to pay for PAHud. GT+ is free and gives you more control over what you see and puts it by each player

PAHud > GT+ >>>> external gametime windows

You can find a link to GT+ and other display systems on the PT website.

[DCWildcat]

[ QUOTE ]
Capping the river is the ultimate spew

[/ QUOTE ]

There's no way this can be the case. If it's -EV, it's very close.

Villain has fairly aggressive stats considering his VP$IP. His range of hands with a K that you beat >>>> those you don't. He's 3-betting lots of trips that you beat. I expect to be ahead here quite often. If capping is incorrect, it is a tiny one at most.

[milesdyson]

[ QUOTE ]
His range of hands with a K that you beat >>>> those you don't. He's 3-betting lots of trips that you beat.

[/ QUOTE ]
this denies the information that he only called our turn raise and has now bet/3-bet the river.

ie. why would he not 3-bet the turn with just trip kings yet 3-bet the river with them?

[Vote4Pedro]

Then why didn't he go ape-[censored] on the turn? Why save it for the river? Villian knows we have a trips, and its not slowing him down. I'd have a hard time capping the river considering the action of the previous streets