|
|
|
|
#1
12-21-2005, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River folds are cool atm.
The postulate is that we are a value betting favorite when merely called. This means our hand has some value. Then we get faced with calling one additional bet. We certainly went from a small favorite to a big dog. But how often is it such a big dog that we don't win 11% "by mistake?" Even so, how would you approach someone like me? You'd value re-raise more against me (to the extent that comes up often) but would have to cut down your bluffs against me, no?
|
|
#3
12-21-2005, 03:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River folds are cool atm.
Why do you say that? I thought we were having an interesting argument. You really did fail to put any pot odds in your example, and the rule I quoted only kicks in at 8 to 1. So, if I was getting better than 8 to 1, I'd have to always call in your example.
|
|
#4
12-21-2005, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River folds are cool atm.
[ QUOTE ]
Why do you say that? I thought we were having an interesting argument. You really did fail to put any pot odds in your example, and the rule I quoted only kicks in at 8 to 1. So, if I was getting better than 8 to 1, I'd have to always call in your example. [/ QUOTE ] maybe I'm wrong, you just seem to keep throwing the conversation off onto bizzare tangents. i didn't list the pot odds because they are irrelevant. we are talking about whether or not a bet is for value. in the example I listed you get value from betting only if you fold when he 3bets. It is to prove my point that there are many situations that you can only value bet/raise if you are able to fold to a raise.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
