Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2005, 08:51 PM
HighestCard HighestCard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Inbetween the 11\'s and 22\'s
Posts: 120
Default 22: Reckless pushbot?

The big blind has been the super LAG type, calling all continuation bets, betting every hand he sees a flop with, thinks top pair is the nuts, ect. Small blind is loose passive. Blinds go up in 4 hands. Good push or too early?


Seat 2: Aniello ($960 in chips)
Seat 3: danbes2_13 ($2,110 in chips)
Seat 5: DHB ($1,435 in chips)
Seat 6: HERO [ AH,8H ] ($1,170 in chips)
Seat 7: Rushtime ($3,610 in chips)
Seat 8: devilfish125 ($5,715 in chips)



ANTES/BLINDS
Rushtime posts blind ($50), devilfish125 posts blind ($100).

PRE-FLOP
Aniello folds, danbes2_13 folds, DHB folds, HERO bets $1,170 and is all-in

Thanks for the imput,

HC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-30-2005, 09:09 PM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

I'm not a huge fan of this move, no.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2005, 09:34 PM
Simplistic Simplistic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

[ QUOTE ]
The big blind has been the super LAG type, calling all continuation bets, betting every hand he sees a flop with, thinks top pair is the nuts, ect. Small blind is loose passive. Blinds go up in 4 hands. Good push or too early?


Seat 2: Aniello ($960 in chips)
Seat 3: danbes2_13 ($2,110 in chips)
Seat 5: DHB ($1,435 in chips)
Seat 6: HERO [ AH,8H ] ($1,170 in chips)
Seat 7: Rushtime ($3,610 in chips)
Seat 8: devilfish125 ($5,715 in chips)



ANTES/BLINDS
Rushtime posts blind ($50), devilfish125 posts blind ($100).

PRE-FLOP
Aniello folds, danbes2_13 folds, DHB folds, HERO bets $1,170 and is all-in

Thanks for the imput,

HC

[/ QUOTE ]
with 10+BB i prefer a raise to 3x.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-30-2005, 09:50 PM
golfcchs golfcchs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 100
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

Not a good push. With both blinds only calling 66+,ATs+,AJo+ you are only .03% by ICM and I bet their ranges are somewhat looser than this.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:04 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

I think you should tighten up your pushing hands cuz with a super lag player WITH chips at a table cuz

1. Your FE is lower
2. Give him time, and hell kill alot of the other players too.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:15 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

[ QUOTE ]
with 10+BB i prefer a raise to 3x.

[/ QUOTE ]

And one of the blinds will push over you a lot of the time here.

It's not a great pushing opportuniy at this stage, as another poster pointed out above. What he didn't mention was that there's effectively no range you can put them on which makes it an especially bad play, either. If they're tight enough you profit slightly from them folding, if they're loose enough what you lose by them calling you more you make up for by being ahead just often enough when it happens.

Given the chipstacks and your position, you're in a crappy spot unless a couple people get stupid soon. I'd probably push this at least some of the time depending on the immediate situation (if it's the first aggression I've shown, I'd be more likely to do it). If it doesn't work out, you move on to the next one. The fact that you're going to get hit with the next blind increase first might be a factor in the decision too, as is how much more likely you are to get away with pushing past the big stacks as opposed to into them.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:25 PM
Simplistic Simplistic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
with 10+BB i prefer a raise to 3x.

[/ QUOTE ]

And one of the blinds will push over you a lot of the time here.

It's not a great pushing opportuniy at this stage, as another poster pointed out above. What he didn't mention was that there's effectively no range you can put them on which makes it an especially bad play, either. If they're tight enough you profit slightly from them folding, if they're loose enough what you lose by them calling you more you make up for by being ahead just often enough when it happens.

Given the chipstacks and your position, you're in a crappy spot unless a couple people get stupid soon. I'd probably push this at least some of the time depending on the immediate situation (if it's the first aggression I've shown, I'd be more likely to do it). If it doesn't work out, you move on to the next one. The fact that you're going to get hit with the next blind increase first might be a factor in the decision too, as is how much more likely you are to get away with pushing past the big stacks as opposed to into them.

[/ QUOTE ]what levels are people playing back? at the 20s they sure as hell aren't.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:25 PM
tjh tjh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

This is close enough that I would say depending on reads it would be correct to fold or push. Raising it up a little against the big stack is not a good plan.

If the big stacks are pushing around the little guys then perhaps you can wait.

If first aggression by you then add a few points FE to the move so perhaps you can push.

This one is close. Depends on the nature of the players I am playing with.

--
tjh
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:28 PM
ChrisV ChrisV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 339
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

Don't try to steal the blind of a known LAG with 6,000 chips when you don't even need it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-30-2005, 10:30 PM
mlagoo mlagoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 811
Default Re: 22: Reckless pushbot?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
with 10+BB i prefer a raise to 3x.

[/ QUOTE ]

And one of the blinds will push over you a lot of the time here.

It's not a great pushing opportuniy at this stage, as another poster pointed out above. What he didn't mention was that there's effectively no range you can put them on which makes it an especially bad play, either. If they're tight enough you profit slightly from them folding, if they're loose enough what you lose by them calling you more you make up for by being ahead just often enough when it happens.

Given the chipstacks and your position, you're in a crappy spot unless a couple people get stupid soon. I'd probably push this at least some of the time depending on the immediate situation (if it's the first aggression I've shown, I'd be more likely to do it). If it doesn't work out, you move on to the next one. The fact that you're going to get hit with the next blind increase first might be a factor in the decision too, as is how much more likely you are to get away with pushing past the big stacks as opposed to into them.

[/ QUOTE ]what levels are people playing back? at the 20s they sure as hell aren't.

[/ QUOTE ]

the OPs read was that the BB was a "super LAG."

I think it stands to reason that a "super LAG" would come over your 3xBB raise a fair amount of the time, putting you to a tough decision. In fact the only real reason to raise 3x would be to induce a bluff, and I'm not really into the idea of inducing bluffs with a hand as marginal as A8s.

So, in this situation, it's really push or fold. I would probably fold here and look for opportunities to attack the blinds of someone tighter, or looking to find a hand (we aren't really in desperation mode yet) to double through the hyperLAG with.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.