Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2005, 10:03 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

Hi, my name is Grisgra, and I have forgotten how to play poker. Seems like it, anyway -- 3BB/100 over 25k hands in March and April, but about running even this month after a super sucky 200BB slide. Some of it, certainly, is horrible luck, but there's definitely some crappy play in there. I just can't tell which is the bigger culprit.

Since I'm new to 10/20, I really can't tell whether I was just running fantastic in March and April, and whether my "true colors" are finally coming out, or whether I was running okay/good in March/April, and this month is just mostly bad luck, not a bad playing style.

I know enough about the main stats that I'm not going to bore you with those -- I'm going to tighten up some to help reduce variance/marginal spots for awhile, blah blah blah. But these stats . . . well, I think there's something in here.

Three questions for all of you 10/20'ers (and others in general) running at 2BB/100+ over lots o' hands:

1) How much do you win with 2-pair compared to pairs and three-of-a-kind?
2) How much do you win with high card compared with one pair?
3) How often, %-wise, do you see a showdown with one pair/high card?

Looking for ratios here. My results were very different from, I think, Alobar's for 2BB/100 at 5/10 -- hugely different. Not sure what to make of it. Looking at my results, the biggest gap seems to be the results for 2-pair. I'm winning the same % at showdown, but a HELL of a lot less money this month with two-pair. Enough of a discrepancy in ratio, in fact, that between that and my only winning with 80% of my boats and flushes, it almost explains the entire discrepancy between this month and the last two.

Anyway, throwing these out there for consideration. Thanks much!



Oh: the Original link
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2005, 10:26 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

[ QUOTE ]
Hi, my name is Grisgra

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi Grisgra, I'm TStoneMBD. Nice to meet you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2005, 12:00 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

I know that stats posts that aren't about VP$IP are trickier, guys, but c'mon . . . a little help please? [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2005, 12:23 PM
Chobohoya Chobohoya is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

Honestly, I'm a little confused by your stats. Judging by the "total times" you have the "show only hands that were not folded" clicked. However, your stats are very different from mine. For example, my W$SD with high card is 19.19, for 13.61 % of total hands. My one pair hands W$SD is 41.66 for 42.21 of total hands. Also, you seem to never get four of a kind... over what, 150k hands? That's not good. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2005, 12:27 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, I'm a little confused by your stats. Judging by the "total times" you have the "show only hands that were not folded" clicked. However, your stats are very different from mine. For example, my W$SD with high card is 19.19, for 13.61 % of total hands. My one pair hands W$SD is 41.66 for 42.21 of total hands. Also, you seem to never get four of a kind... over what, 150k hands? That's not good. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

The former point suggests I'm going to showdown with unimproved high cards too often, I think. The results for one-pair aren't *too* different. Curious as to what your ratios are for the stuff I mentioned, though.

The quad stats got cut off, didn't think those were hugely important. Lucky me, though, I didn't lose any money with quads [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2005, 12:38 PM
Chobohoya Chobohoya is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

Here's my stats tab since march. I haven't had much time to play, so it's only like 35k hands. I've been running at about 1BB/100.

[image][/image]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2005, 01:00 PM
aslowjoe aslowjoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 36
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

I am not sure these atats are for anything other then entertainment purposes. So much of the time a big win can come from a pair vs hitting your full house and having everbody fold on the flop. Having said that I do like stats and you add a lot to this forum so here are mine for 5/10. I am not good at this print screen thing and my son is not home to help.

High card 17.04/12.68
1 pair.... 45.03/41.39
2 pair.... 57.31/25.97
3of akind 69.02/6.99
straight. 78.95/4.57
flush..... 84.62/4.19
fullhouse 89.11/4.01
Hands that were not folded.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-24-2005, 01:06 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

[ QUOTE ]
I am not sure these atats are for anything other then entertainment purposes. So much of the time a big win can come from a pair vs hitting your full house and having everbody fold on the flop. Having said that I do like stats and you add a lot to this forum so here are mine for 5/10. I am not good at this print screen thing and my son is not home to help.

High card 17.04/12.68
1 pair.... 45.03/41.39
2 pair.... 57.31/25.97
3of akind 69.02/6.99
straight. 78.95/4.57
flush..... 84.62/4.19
fullhouse 89.11/4.01
Hands that were not folded.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nobody is calculating those ratios [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]. Well, at least it's something -- and damn, you've got some of the big stuff over 4%, nice.

One thing to add -- when you post, pls post your BB/100 as well.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2005, 02:51 PM
motorholdem motorholdem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 111
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

Isn't it hard to read too much into "two pair" stats.

Don't they include pocket pairs plus boarded pairs, two boarded pairs (assuming you have best kicker to get the win), and having both your pocket cards pair-up.

How much can you read into a stat with this many variables?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2005, 03:04 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: A new \"Miscellaneous Stats Tab\" post . . .

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't it hard to read too much into "two pair" stats.

Don't they include pocket pairs plus boarded pairs, two boarded pairs (assuming you have best kicker to get the win), and having both your pocket cards pair-up.

How much can you read into a stat with this many variables?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I think you can read something into it over tens of thousands of total hands. If you take a look at many tabs you see that the total won with trips/flushes/boats turns out to be around the same, for instance, even though there are lots of ways you can get trips.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.