Sklansky beats Johnny Chan - Page 2

Jake (The Snake) · #1 03-06-2005, 05:50 AM

I just hope they don't mention 2+2 on the broadcasts.

kurosh · #2 03-06-2005, 05:59 AM

Anyone else think there's going to be a huge influx of new people?

Hold'me · #3 03-06-2005, 12:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else think there's going to be a huge influx of new people?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

That guy · #4 03-06-2005, 12:37 PM

I can already FEEL Hold Em Poker For Advanced Players climbing up the NY Times best seller list...

Dynasty · #5 03-06-2005, 07:32 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I just hope they don't mention 2+2 on the broadcasts.

[/ QUOTE ]

About thirty years ago, players thought the publication of Super System would ruin games by educating the fish. The same concerns were expressed with the publication of other good books.

How are the games today?

daryn · #6 03-06-2005, 01:30 PM

<blockquote>In risposta di:<hr />
<blockquote>In risposta di:<hr />
from CardPlayer.com:

Date / Time: 2005-03-06 00:22:00
Title: Johnny Chan v. David Sklansky
Log: After doubling up twice, Johnny Chan can't make it three in a row. He is still short stacked and goes all in with 7-4, and Sklansky blindly calls, revealing A-J. The board comes K-6-2-6-A, eliminating Johnny Chan after long battles with two very tough opponents today. David Sklansky advances to Round 3, where he will face Scott Fischman.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please God, in the name of all that is holy, let Sklansky beat Fischman.

Disclaimer: I am not at all religious; in fact, I am an atheist.

[/ QUOTE ]

read: in fact, I am an idiot. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Metnut · #7 03-06-2005, 04:06 PM

How exactly is this event working? One loss and you are out? I think a better way to do it would be bo5 or bo7, but make the blinds go up a little a faster so it doesnt take that long. Yea it would take a little longer, but it would be a better event.