PP Low Limits

DRKEVDC · #1 09-23-2005, 06:38 PM

I know that this is going to sound crazy, however, I believe that the better poker players at PP are playing either below 2/4 or 5/10 and above. Over the last couple of thousand hands at 2/4 and 3/6 the play has been comically bad. I see stuff at these limits you never see at 1/2 and .05/1.

Does anyone else see it this way?

jman220 · #2 09-23-2005, 07:34 PM

Your table selection needs work.

POKhER · #3 09-23-2005, 08:25 PM

He means the players at 2/4 3/6 SUCK.
Therefore he wins lots? Therefore his tableselection must be good or hes right.

His post was confusing though.

jman220 · #4 09-23-2005, 09:40 PM

[ QUOTE ]
He means the players at 2/4 3/6 SUCK.
Therefore he wins lots? Therefore his tableselection must be good or hes right.

His post was confusing though.

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant his table selection at limits lower than 2/4 needs work. I was teaching a friend how to play and started him off on the .5/1 tables. Dear god that was a fish fest.

#5 09-23-2005, 11:33 PM

Well, there are no 6-max tables at 2/4, which would explain a lot at that level, but I'm not so sure about 3/6. Maybe the misinformation that a new player should start at a level where their opponents "take the money seriously"?

I do know that the fish on my .5/1 and 1/2 buddy lists have mostly moved up to those levels.

jstewsmole · #6 09-24-2005, 01:03 AM

[ QUOTE ]

I meant his table selection at limits lower than 2/4 needs work. I was teaching a friend how to play and started him off on the .5/1 tables. Dear god that was a fish fest.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont think anyone needs work at selecting tables in micros.

Anyways the play as u move up generally gets better. The players at 2/4 are in general better than .5/1 games. There obviously is still pretty bad play at 2/4.

2/4 has gotten marginally tougher when the 3/6 6 max tables opened. I see many 3/6 full tags now playing 2/4 all the time probably because they dont like or are not comfortable playing short handed.