|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
[ QUOTE ]
Turn is a 5. SB bets, I raise... [/ QUOTE ] folding to a three-bet and taking a free showdown, nh. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
Pretty close to a fold I'd say on the flop, which is why I would never raise 22 here preflop. That said, against an unknown I'm not letting him have the pot so raising this turn is a must.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
stealing with small pocket pairs can't be profitable in the party 20 game, although i would love to see some numbers to refute or backup my statement.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
[ QUOTE ]
stealing with small pocket pairs can't be profitable in the party 20 game, although i would love to see some numbers to refute or backup my statement. [/ QUOTE ] So you'll raise 77+ in that spot? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] stealing with small pocket pairs can't be profitable in the party 20 game, although i would love to see some numbers to refute or backup my statement. [/ QUOTE ] So you'll raise 77+ in that spot? [/ QUOTE ] I'd go as low as 55+ if the numbers of the blinds showed enough possibility of fold equity. I hope my post didn't sound condescending, I definately didn't mean it to be that way. I just have found that 22-44 was not a stealing hand in this game. I do think you played the hand quite well after the flop. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] stealing with small pocket pairs can't be profitable in the party 20 game, although i would love to see some numbers to refute or backup my statement. [/ QUOTE ] So you'll raise 77+ in that spot? [/ QUOTE ] I'd go as low as 55+ if the numbers of the blinds showed enough possibility of fold equity. I hope my post didn't sound condescending, I definately didn't mean it to be that way. I just have found that 22-44 was not a stealing hand in this game. I do think you played the hand quite well after the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm, that's interesting. I am raising any playable hand here and most crappy hands as well. With position, the extra SB, and seeing that the CO has cheese I'm looking for excuses to get involved. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] stealing with small pocket pairs can't be profitable in the party 20 game, although i would love to see some numbers to refute or backup my statement. [/ QUOTE ] So you'll raise 77+ in that spot? [/ QUOTE ] I'd go as low as 55+ if the numbers of the blinds showed enough possibility of fold equity. I hope my post didn't sound condescending, I definately didn't mean it to be that way. I just have found that 22-44 was not a stealing hand in this game. I do think you played the hand quite well after the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm, that's interesting. I am raising any playable hand here and most crappy hands as well. With position, the extra SB, and seeing that the CO has cheese I'm looking for excuses to get involved. [/ QUOTE ] okay, fair enough. my problem with those hands is probably I don't play them well enough postflop in all honesty. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
I like this hand a lot, Dave. What turn cards are you not raising when you call the flop c/r? A? 4? T/J/K? Or are you always raising the turn...
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
i would fold the flop. you are playing with fulltable fags remember. expect to see a4 here and realize you made him feel smart.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why did you checkraise?
i only like pf if the blinds are so tight that you would make this play with xx.
|
|
|