#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big Blind hand for review!
Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (8 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero checks. Flop: (2.50 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 caps</font>, Hero calls. Turn: (5.25 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 bets</font>, Hero calls. River: (7.25 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 bets</font>, Hero calls. Final Pot: 9.25 BB Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> Hero has 6s Qc (two pair, queens and tens). MP2 has 3d Tc (three of a kind, tens). Outcome: MP2 wins 9.25 BB. </font> Questions: Should I bet out on this flop? Am I a moron for 3 betting the flop? (I think I am) Why should I be surprised when he tables T3o? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
I think your line of play is good.
Another one would be to bet and call the flop, bet the turn and fold to a raise (against a passive player, not a player like this). Against players like this its extremely important that you get a read on them and start taking their money fast. If not they could steal a lot of pots like this from you. SkyRocker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
Looking at the size of the pot I think I'd just check/fold the flop. Let this one go to the guy in position, it's not worth fighting for.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
After the flop reraise I would have called down. If he wouldn't have bet the turn (and took the free card) I would have bet the river when a non-flushcard nor overcard hit.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
Reads would help in this hand immensely. Against a very passive opponent, 3-betting is less of a good idea than against an aggressive opponent.
Top pair, even with no kicker, is a strong hand HU, so 3-betting is probably fine against an unknown, as is calling down once capped. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
Looking back on this hand, I tend to agree with the bet and fold to a raise idea with a pot this small.
Not exactly sure what I was thinking here! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
[ QUOTE ]
After the flop reraise I would have called down. If he wouldn't have bet the turn (and took the free card) I would have bet the river when a non-flushcard nor overcard hit. [/ QUOTE ] How is Hero supposed to get a free turn card out of position and against a flop aggressor? This type of play is very read dependent. Unless MP1 is ultra passive normally, I wouldn't lay it down. I'd probably call down from MP1's flop raise. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
Looking back I have him at my table for 34 hands with a 100% VP$P, and 58.82 PFR! I think I now remember why I 3-bet him.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
[ QUOTE ]
Reads would help in this hand immensely. Against a very passive opponent, 3-betting is less of a good idea than against an aggressive opponent. Top pair, even with no kicker, is a strong hand HU, so 3-betting is probably fine against an unknown, as is calling down once capped. [/ QUOTE ] Ok, so assuming we think top pair HU is good enough to go forward, I think I lean toward a check/raise on the flop rather than leading. You get better information from the response, and it only costs an extra SB. If you get 3-bet I think you can assume villain has a Q. (And likely has you beat.) If just a call, you might get him to fold by leading the turn. (This villain seems to be a bit too much of a maniac for this outcome, but I think against standard opponents you might have some success.) I agree. Reads are a necessity in this hand. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big Blind hand for review!
[ QUOTE ]
Looking back I have him at my table for 34 hands with a 100% VP$P, and 58.82 PFR! I think I now remember why I 3-bet him. [/ QUOTE ] In that case, nice hand [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
|