Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?

[mmcd]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Kukavic
SteveG (2+2)
Ramabird
GAescapee

[/ QUOTE ]

At least two of these are breakeven at best.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know GAescape and steveG aren't break even. thats a fact. so your contention is that ramabird is breakeven? (i dont know the first guy)

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]


Kukavica = Pastir (from Ljubljana) and he is almost certailny a winner.

[Klepton]

i think you guys need to stop worrying about other players and start worrying about how well you are playing.

has the MH limit and NL sections become celebrity sighting forums?

PRAHLAD IS DOWN 800K!!!


CHIP REESE IS UP 4,000,000 THIS WEEK!!!!


DANDRUFF HAS HEMORHOIDS!!!!!


DOYLE BRUNSON PLAYED GOLF FOR 100K A HOLE TODAY!!!!!



PHIL HELLMUTH LOST HIS COOL!!!!!!



SOME GUY JUST WON A POT ONLINE!!!!

[Mig]

Who are the biggest winner at 30/60 beside derb ?

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
Who are the biggest winner at 30/60 beside derb ?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, don't have 30/60 numbers.

___1___

[Steve Giufre]

That lucky bastard Obi One has won a lot in that game.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on the limits...Some say the 30 game is softer than the 20 and 15.

Brian R

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this true and if so, why do I always here so much bitching about how tough the 30 is?

[/ QUOTE ]


coming from someone who has played a large number of hands in both the 20 and the 30, the 30 is far tougher than the 20 and its not close IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

It makes me laugh that you were pretty much exclusively a small stakes poster until recently, then you came here all a-jitter about your first few hands at mid-migh, and now you stroll around MH like you own the place. A "large number" of hands at both limits is about 200k, son. Get back to us when you've played that many.

Lol (see? laughing ...)

[/ QUOTE ]

never in recent memory have i seen such an instance of pot calling ketle black.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? Because post count equals experience at poker? Hardly. I'd just never bothered to come to the website on the back of the books until recently, but I'm quite sure I have more poker experience than you, and more than most of the posters on this board.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on the limits...Some say the 30 game is softer than the 20 and 15.

Brian R

[/ QUOTE ]
javascript: x()

Is this true and if so, why do I always here so much bitching about how tough the 30 is?

[/ QUOTE ]


coming from someone who has played a large number of hands in both the 20 and the 30, the 30 is far tougher than the 20 and its not close IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

It makes me laugh that you were pretty much exclusively a small stakes poster until recently, then you came here all a-jitter about your first few hands at mid-migh, and now you stroll around MH like you own the place. A "large number" of hands at both limits is about 200k, son. Get back to us when you've played that many.

Lol (see? laughing ...)

[/ QUOTE ]

you are a moron. 30K hands at each limit is enough for me to know which is TOUGHER. hell, i could tell 30/60 was going to be a lot tougher after my first few sessions. and judging from your posts you are a 15/30 player who is probably struggling just to breakeven after rakeback, so please, don't lecture me about sample sizes.

ps i don't "stroll around midhigh" either...i post primarily in HUSH and rarely in here because almost all of the games i play are short handed.

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt you even have 30k hands at anything above 5-10, lol.

And no, I don't struggle, particularly at the 15. You'd know how easy it is if you played more MH and less SS.

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
I doubt you even have 30k hands at anything above 5-10, lol.

And no, I don't struggle, particularly at the 15. You'd know how easy it is if you played more MH and less SS.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, are you 13? Just STFU and do everyone a favor...

___1___

[Danenania]

Neat post, __1__. Some good research there.