#1
|
|||
|
|||
When four monitors just aren\'t enough
Anyone care to figure out how many tables that is? (Approx $250,000, btw.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
i dont understand this thread.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
OP probably meant to post a pic, but didn't
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
[ QUOTE ]
OP probably meant to post a pic, but didn't [/ QUOTE ] figured as much |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] OP probably meant to post a pic, but didn't [/ QUOTE ] figured as much [/ QUOTE ] He did; the link's down. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
30 monitors = ~120 tables, not counting mini-views. I have one of these, it takes me about an hour to clear every bonus for every site for the month, leaving room to enter a few freerolls.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
[ QUOTE ]
OP probably meant to post a pic, but didn't [/ QUOTE ] This website was featured on CNN.com, my guess is they couldn't handle the bandwidth. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
u could do 240 tables with the pp beta software on there
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
nsdjoe,
If you count how many monitors there are from top to bottom, and then count the number of monitors accross, you can multiply these two figures and arrive at the total number of monitors. Saves time over counting them all up! In this case there are 30 monitors, yielding probably about 120 tables. Diabloingly, JBB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When four monitors just aren\'t enough
Whoa! I bet you can play at least two tables on that there setup.
|
|
|