|
|
|
|
#2
12-29-2005, 12:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
Stars has a ton of play money and micro limit players (and lots of low $ tourney players). As Obsidian points out, game liquidity at mid level ring games is much better at Party.
But I'd certainly like to see Stars improve and draw more mid-limit players! 
|
|
#4
12-29-2005, 02:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] game liquidity at ALL ring games is much better at Party. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] Ok I've gone this long without figuring it out, call me a [censored], but I must ask now. WHAT DOES FYP MEAN!?!?! Edit: thanks wikipedia!
|
|
#5
12-29-2005, 02:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] game liquidity at ALL ring games is much better at Party. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] ISSCKM [/ QUOTE ] FYP
|
|
#9
12-29-2005, 05:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
[ QUOTE ]
As we speak 70k Stars vs 68k Party. nh ToT [/ QUOTE ] Sample size
|
|
#10
12-29-2005, 09:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
Awhile back, I claimed that Stars would be the undisputed bigger site by the end of January. Quite a few disagreed if I remember correctly.
Still, Party is much larger if you are talking about mid-high limit games, though if Stars gradually starts to surpass Party and it becomes accepted, that will change too. Interestingly, I only ever made the claim that Stars would surpass party because I was talking about the "world's biggest poker room" banner that Party always has displayed, and what stars would do when they surpassed them. ... And I notice that Stars now has, at the very top of their website... "three world Champions welcome you to the World's Largest Poker Website" In terms of sheer numbers, anybody still think Party will be bigger by Feb 1? Fidel
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
