Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2004, 01:46 AM
jcaesar jcaesar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default 10/20 NL hand

10/20

I have BB with
J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

A consistent winning player limps 1st in from MP. Button raises minimum to $40. I call in the BB, MP calls as well.
Pot size: $120

Flop:
T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I check, MP bets $120. Button folds, I raise to $360. MP calls.
Pot size: $840

Turn:
5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I check, and MP bets out $400. After some deliberation, I raise him all-in for ~$1200 more.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2004, 02:00 AM
Lucky Lucky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 81
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

Don't call pre-flop.

After that, though, it was fine. He probably has slick, with the As, maybe 99 or 1010.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2004, 02:38 AM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

Bet out on the flop. Either a cheap pokey looking bet or a nice fat overbet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2004, 03:01 AM
jcaesar jcaesar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

[ QUOTE ]
Either a cheap pokey looking bet

[/ QUOTE ]

Wouldn't a pokey bet be giving a flush draw proper odds to draw?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2004, 03:03 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

Hi jcaesar,
You played this one very well, as long as you felt it was likely that your opponent would bet the turn if you checked. You want him to bet, and if you're beaten, you must live with it. His bet size is excellent, by the way, as it looks like a bet that doesn't mind being called. Calling pre-flop is automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2004, 03:10 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

Hi Lucky,
[ QUOTE ]
Don't call pre-flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
Be serious. This is an excellent spot to play QJs. You get to have a pot-building raise, and since someone else made it, you give away nothing about your hand. I would never, ever fold this pre-flop for $20 when one player in the pot has about $2000 in front of him.
[ QUOTE ]
He probably has slick, with the As, maybe 99 or 1010.

[/ QUOTE ]
He probably DOESN'T have slick, as this would be a re-raising hand to many strong players. But a medium pair is a good guess. The obvious danger is that Axs is also a likely candidate to be played this way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2004, 03:15 AM
Nero Nero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 62
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

pre-flop - easy call.

flop - really dislike going for the check-raise here. i would lead out here almost all the time as there is a player between you and the PFR. It is also a possiblity the flop doesnt get bet.

turn - i really like your check-raise here. you have no spade and most opponents can't pass up this bet when checked to, trying to protect their hand or represent a bigger hand.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2004, 03:24 AM
jcaesar jcaesar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

[ QUOTE ]
flop - really dislike going for the check-raise here. i would lead out here almost all the time as there is a player between you and the PFR. It is also a possiblity the flop doesnt get bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nero, between the type of players that were in, I knew almost 100% that the flop would be bet. Mainly, my play here was to trap the button, who I knew would bet automatically if we both checked to him as the PFR. I had this read on him because he obviously had an inflated ego from catching a nice run of cards and a tilted player that pushed his buy-in from $2000 to a ridiculous stack of $16,000). Previously, he had been betting hands like 37o and J3o from position at any sign of weakness from those to act before him.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2004, 03:50 AM
jcaesar jcaesar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: 10/20 NL hand

[ QUOTE ]
turn - i really like your check-raise here. you have no spade and most opponents can't pass up this bet when checked to, trying to protect their hand or represent a bigger hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry for the double post, but why do you like the checkraise with my lack of spade outs? Seems to me it would've been better if I had a chance to improve to a better hand on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2004, 04:40 AM
jcaesar jcaesar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: Results

MP called my all-in raise rather quickly with 8 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Given this knowledge, does this change anything about what you guys think?

I feel as though I should've bet the scare card and folded to a raise. If he had called my bet on the turn, it would've been a tough call on the river. Considering, however, that the river was a 4th [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], it appears that I would've been able to save myself some money in that situation.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.