Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2005, 08:09 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

2/4 PP
Raising villain is 35/19 (with 1k+)
Calling villain is 65/38 (with 600)

Hero is button with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (with 366)

Preflop
Raising villain opens utg for 18 (this is a little large), folded to hero, who calls, SB calls, calling villain calls in the BB

Flop (72)
K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
check, check, UTG bets 45, hero calls, SB folds, BB calls

Turn (207)
Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
check, villain checks, hero bets 120, BB calls, villain makes it 550 to go, hero calls 185 more, BB folds.

Comments?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2005, 08:46 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

Combo hands in raised pots are interesting I think. OOP I want to get to 3-bet all-in on the flop so I like leading. In position I'm still tempted to put in a pot-committing raise / push on the flop. You have less than 100BB and the pot is already $120. That said, your hand doesn't mind multi-way action so calling can work out well too. As played I like your half-pot on the turn & obviously you have to call the re-raise.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2005, 08:55 AM
Vavavoom Vavavoom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 34
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

The worst hand u can expect to see is JT....with J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] being the worst as it cuts down your flush outs....Wouldn't be suprised if u are up against AK or 99 here......I call in a heartbeat I think although something tells me you are up against KK.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2005, 09:07 AM
jkkkk jkkkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Making moves in weak-tight land.
Posts: 637
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2005, 09:19 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Results

Villain had 99 and I didnt hit the river.

I think this is a truly horrible way to play 99 flopped set. I think I have one of the only hands that can call him when he check-raises.

Anybody agree? Why check-raise the set here, I think its yucky. If I have something like A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then I would check behind and get a free shot to flush-up. Only I hit such a big hand did I get involved.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2005, 09:22 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

[ QUOTE ]
Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm torn between calling the active villain again, and pushing. I dont mind the other guy staying in. And there arent *too* many cards that I dont like to see (a J or a T spring to mind, and maybe an A, but only non-diamond versions).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2005, 09:35 AM
jkkkk jkkkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Making moves in weak-tight land.
Posts: 637
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm torn between calling the active villain again, and pushing. I dont mind the other guy staying in. And there arent *too* many cards that I dont like to see (a J or a T spring to mind, and maybe an A, but only non-diamond versions).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think push is superior because

1. Calling villain could be on the bigger flush draw.

2. Raising villain could have AK

It is a horrible way to play a set unless he knows you are going to bet a draw on the turn, but oh well, next hand.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2005, 10:24 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm torn between calling the active villain again, and pushing. I dont mind the other guy staying in. And there arent *too* many cards that I dont like to see (a J or a T spring to mind, and maybe an A, but only non-diamond versions).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think push is superior because

1. Calling villain could be on the bigger flush draw.

2. Raising villain could have AK

It is a horrible way to play a set unless he knows you are going to bet a draw on the turn, but oh well, next hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im going broke on a diamond, so if he does have A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]X[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then c'est la vie. But if he has a draw, then I dont mind him staying in the pot, because most of the time he is drawing stone dead.

If Raising villain has AK, then I dont want to raise and push him off it. What if the river bricks ... and he checks ... and I get to represent a missed flush who is now bluff-pushing?

Im not sure I like raising, if I will lose AK and a lower [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] draw, then is it not a bad play to raise?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-29-2005, 10:39 AM
jkkkk jkkkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Making moves in weak-tight land.
Posts: 637
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm torn between calling the active villain again, and pushing. I dont mind the other guy staying in. And there arent *too* many cards that I dont like to see (a J or a T spring to mind, and maybe an A, but only non-diamond versions).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think push is superior because

1. Calling villain could be on the bigger flush draw.

2. Raising villain could have AK

It is a horrible way to play a set unless he knows you are going to bet a draw on the turn, but oh well, next hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im going broke on a diamond, so if he does have A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]X[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then c'est la vie. But if he has a draw, then I dont mind him staying in the pot, because most of the time he is drawing stone dead.

If Raising villain has AK, then I dont want to raise and push him off it. What if the river bricks ... and he checks ... and I get to represent a missed flush who is now bluff-pushing?

Im not sure I like raising, if I will lose AK and a lower [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] draw, then is it not a bad play to raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I think that is indeed a big if, maybe you do lose them, maybe you don't. Maybe you see the bigger flush draw more times than you see a smaller one, your certainly not getting any more money from a draw on the river though.

Also pushing gets all of raising villains $ in (if he calls) but if you call and the river is a [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then you lose a lot of value to AK.

I guess arguments can be made for both cases, but I simply like pushing because there are a lot of river cards that make both villains fold + they can outdraw you.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-29-2005, 10:57 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: 2/4 KQs top pair+flush draw

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm torn between calling the active villain again, and pushing. I dont mind the other guy staying in. And there arent *too* many cards that I dont like to see (a J or a T spring to mind, and maybe an A, but only non-diamond versions).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think push is superior because

1. Calling villain could be on the bigger flush draw.

2. Raising villain could have AK

It is a horrible way to play a set unless he knows you are going to bet a draw on the turn, but oh well, next hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im going broke on a diamond, so if he does have A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]X[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then c'est la vie. But if he has a draw, then I dont mind him staying in the pot, because most of the time he is drawing stone dead.

If Raising villain has AK, then I dont want to raise and push him off it. What if the river bricks ... and he checks ... and I get to represent a missed flush who is now bluff-pushing?

Im not sure I like raising, if I will lose AK and a lower [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] draw, then is it not a bad play to raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I think that is indeed a big if, maybe you do lose them, maybe you don't. Maybe you see the bigger flush draw more times than you see a smaller one, your certainly not getting any more money from a draw on the river though.

Also pushing gets all of raising villains $ in (if he calls) but if you call and the river is a [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then you lose a lot of value to AK.

I guess arguments can be made for both cases, but I simply like pushing because there are a lot of river cards that make both villains fold + they can outdraw you.

[/ QUOTE ]

AK normally folds to a turn push, especially when the push is into a field ... I probably push if I dont hit the Q and villain bets, as then I might get him to fold, having outs if he calls. But now that I've hit the Q .... I like to keep him in I think.

Other villain could have a bigger diamond draw, but its unlikely I guess as I hold both the K and the Q. Still, it certainly possible. But if he can hold a smaller flush draw (which he surely can) then pushing must be bad as he might fold, and that would prevent the glorious opportunity to stack him on a rivered diamond. Yes, I risk getting stacked myself by the nut-flush draw, but surely its worth it as its much more likely that he has a worse draw/worse made hand.

Thinking more on it, I think I would call, in position on raising villain, hoping to stack raising villain on a blank, and calling villain on a diamond.

Thoughts ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.