|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
[ QUOTE ]
All the 2k games are harder than all the 1k games. The 2k short is much harder than the 2k full. The End. [/ QUOTE ] what he said. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] All the 2k games are harder than all the 1k games. The 2k short is much harder than the 2k full. The End. [/ QUOTE ] what he said. [/ QUOTE ] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
I'll second this as well. While you do get the occasional big fish who wanders in, donates 3-5k and is never heard from again, most of the time the average 2k table has 4-6 tough regulars who would all be crushing at the 1k tables. The SH 2k specialists to fish ratio is especially high lately.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
[ QUOTE ]
All the 2k games are harder than all the 1k games. The 2k short is much harder than the 2k full. The End. [/ QUOTE ] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
more aggressive games always SEEM softer in isolation. how many times have people commented on the 25/50 and 50/100 UB games being that way?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
does anyone have anything to comment on stars games? i see a lot of the same donks that play 400 NL play 5/10 full-ring, yet i kick their butts repeatedly at 400 NL
wish i had the roll for 5/10 though ive also been obsing the 10/20 full-ring games on stars, it seems like a lot of the same people with maybe 1-3 fish at each table ... though im sure a lot of those "same people" are losers in the long run |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier? *DELETED*
Post deleted by James282
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier? *DELETED*
Deleted, posted some hands from you in my DB but someone told me that was in poor taste, so PM me if you want to know what they were(or if you want me to post them and others can chime in as well).
-James |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 5/10 vs. 10/20: 2K game easier?
apparently the limit forum still does not know how to properly use the converter
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This is probably why
For a long time I played 5/10 6 max on Party successfully, I then took a long run of bad beats that nearly killed my bankroll. I have many observations and PT info that says that the 3/6 and 5/10 nl 6 max are easier and looser games than the 2/4 nl on party, which i think consists of primarily nutsetters. If the 10/20 nl on party is weaker than the 5/10 it is for one important reason: Many fish with lots of money want to play the absolute highest stakes possible, that is why this summer the weakest game on the net (with high stakes) was the Party 5/10 nl, which has perhaps migrated to the 10/20 nl, just because the higher the stakes attract the bigger fish, becuase many people are looking for the highest nl games. This is similar to watching the chumps on the high limit games... people with huge bankrolls and money to gamble will play the highest stakes possible. That's my explanation.
|
|
|