|
|
#21
11-09-2005, 08:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
I think Phil made a good job. Coming in 2nd last year and 3rd this year.
|
|
#22
11-09-2005, 09:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
I would've prefered Hellmuth, honestly >_> [/ QUOTE ] Blasphemy.
|
|
#23
11-09-2005, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
I think Phil made a good job. Coming in 2nd last year and 3rd this year. [/ QUOTE ] Coming in 2nd in a sit and go is NOT impressive. He did well in this, sure, but as said before, he was invited; he didn't earn the right to be there. I'm getting to the point whereI can no longer stomach the man, personally, and am quickly becoming a big Matusow fan.
|
|
#24
11-09-2005, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
Eventually, even Steve Dannenmann jumps into things, saying that as a professional poker player, he isn't acting very professionally. They exchange a few more words, and Dannenmann caps it off by saying, "Nobody should buy your books or CDs, because you're a punk." [/ QUOTE ] That does it. I didn't like Dannenmann much after the Lederer phone call, but everything ESPN has shown since then has made me think the guy's actually pretty okay. And now, to hear that he told Hellmuth he's a punk? Priceless. How could anybody not like Dannenmann now?
|
|
#25
11-09-2005, 01:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
Matusow continues to grow on me- Hellmuth says, "You know I finished second in this event last year. There's only one way to improve." To that, Matusow responds, "If you keep getting INVITED to tournaments, it's easy to finish second." [/ QUOTE ] omg, the sheer awesomeness
|
|
#26
11-09-2005, 01:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
The 50/100NL players on UB are probably salivating
|
|
#27
11-09-2005, 01:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
Would have been nice for Corkins to win. At least he wouldn't be as likely to piss away the million so quickly. I wonder how much Matusow sold of himself for this? Hmm, maybe that's why Juanda was so vocal in his support.
|
|
#28
11-09-2005, 01:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
Would have been nice for Corkins to win. At least he wouldn't be as likely to piss away the million so quickly. I wonder how much Matusow sold of himself for this? Hmm, maybe that's why Juanda was so vocal in his support. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, why would Mike 'sell' himself for a freeroll tournament? That doesn't make any sense at all. It's not like he had to put anything up for the entry. Am I missing something? And maybe J.J. was so vocal in his support, uh, I dunno, because they're ... friends?
|
|
#29
11-09-2005, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think Phil made a good job. Coming in 2nd last year and 3rd this year. [/ QUOTE ] Coming in 2nd in a sit and go is NOT impressive. [/ QUOTE ] But this was hardest SNG in the history of poker! This is very impressive. This is what I think.
|
|
#30
11-09-2005, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 TOC Update *SPOILERS*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Would have been nice for Corkins to win. At least he wouldn't be as likely to piss away the million so quickly. I wonder how much Matusow sold of himself for this? Hmm, maybe that's why Juanda was so vocal in his support. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, why would Mike 'sell' himself for a freeroll tournament? That doesn't make any sense at all. It's not like he had to put anything up for the entry. Am I missing something? And maybe J.J. was so vocal in his support, uh, I dunno, because they're ... friends? [/ QUOTE ] Or maybe its because Matusow is a FTP guy and he's giving their business a boost with the win/exposure G
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
