Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-19-2005, 03:47 AM
Alex/Mugaaz Alex/Mugaaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 403
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This led me to wonder whether I'd be willing to risk 10% of my total liquid assets as a 55/45 favorite. Hard to say for sure when it's just theoretical, but I'm fairly certain that I'd take that bet. Maybe not for more than 30% though...

[/ QUOTE ]



I believe that Doyle Brunson said in SS1 that he'd bet everything he owned on a coin flip if he got 2-1 odds.

[/ QUOTE ]


I think it was 10-1

[/ QUOTE ]

It was.

[/ QUOTE ]
Well hell, anybody would do that.

[/ QUOTE ]

The vast majority of people certainly would not. More than 60% of 2+2 posters also would not.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-19-2005, 06:26 AM
meow_meow meow_meow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 180
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

[ QUOTE ]
phil is a gambler, youre wrong about that.

youre also wrong about his reasons for not taking daniels offer. i believe that phil knows daniel is the favorite. he also doesnt play this high for many reasons. i really doubt that phil is worth 5 mill. lets be realistic here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Care to elaborate on "Phil the gambler"?

Also, the discussion on cardplayer went like this:
Phil: " Assuming I'm a 55/45 favorite, I wouldn't play for 500k...", so it really isn't relevant whether he would actually be a favorite or not.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-19-2005, 07:34 AM
sekrah sekrah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 998
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

Somebody might have posted this already.. But Hellmuth said in his book that for a while he was addicted to Craps.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-19-2005, 09:20 AM
Artsemis Artsemis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

Including me.

Its one thing for people to say it, but I highly doubt many of the people that say it would literally put -everything- they own on the line unless the chance of loss was miniscule.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-19-2005, 10:15 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

[ QUOTE ]
Its one thing for people to say it, but I highly doubt many of the people that say it would literally put -everything- they own on the line unless the chance of loss was miniscule.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's easy to say when the chances of being taken up on it are virtually zero
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-19-2005, 11:37 AM
Sponger15SB Sponger15SB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Isla Vista
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

[ QUOTE ]

Even if I had 30 million dollar bankroll I wouldn't play headsup for 500k.

[/ QUOTE ]




jk
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-19-2005, 11:47 AM
djoyce003 djoyce003 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 139
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

that's a rooster not a chicken.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-19-2005, 11:48 AM
djoyce003 djoyce003 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 139
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

[ QUOTE ]
dude

1) taxes
2) 17 years
3) expenses
4) deduct buyins pls
5) he might have been bankrolled for some of the events and only took a portion (?)

[/ QUOTE ]

dude

Interest
appreciation of capital

Assuming he invested at least a portion of it semi-wisely it should double in value theoretically every 7 years. If he was smart about the tech bubble it doubled a lot faster than that. It wouldn't surprise me if he's worth at least 5 mil as well but then again, I don't really care.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:09 PM
vindikation vindikation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 181
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

May I remind everyone that Hellmuth won the National Head's Up Championship?

If anyone should consider themselves a favorite to play a head's up Hold Em game it should be Hellmuth.

I really respect his decision not to "gamble".
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:23 PM
Cooker Cooker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 159
Default Re: Phil Hellmuth - not a gambler

A rooster is a chicken. Female chickens are hens. Male chickens are roosters.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.